On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:32:48 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:07:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:52:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:36:26 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
news:b0duo1ti0qojrsd5c6155p8vnbdtok0lu0@4ax .com...
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:19:52 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
. atl.earthlink.net...

It's not a matter of agreeing with him. The question is: do you
believe
he
is telling the truth?

He stated certain *facts* about Iraq, that are in direct contrast
to
what
the news media would have us believe. Is he lying or is the news
media
lying?

Two separate questions for you. Sit down.

1) Is it possible that a new school could be successfully completed,
opened
and populated in one part of Iraq, while in another location, things
are
a
total ****ing mess and have only gotten worse?

2) Is it possible that a senator might not be willing or able to
tour
the
second location, where even our own servicemen enter at extreme risk
to
themselves, in armored vehicles which are not immune to roadside
bombs?


Regardless, Doug. Why is the major media keeping silent about it?

Silent about what?

Lieberman's views, especially given the hype Murtha's gotten (and
getting).

John, I think you need more variety in your news sources. Lieberman's
thing
wasn't buried. Is something wrong with your local newspaper, or
broadcast
networks?


HO, HO, HO!
--
John H

Where did you first see Lieberman's article?


Wall Street Journal, courtesy of NOYB who posted it here. This was after
Hannity
made mention of the fact that *none* of the major media gave it any play.
--
John H

Do you consider WSJ to fall under the heading of "mainstream press"?

Mainstream, perhaps. Major media, no.
--
John H

"It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!"
[A Self-obsessed Hypocrite]