"DSK" wrote in message
...
Dan J.S. wrote:
By your logic, so is the entire congress and senate... because they all
agreed invading Iraq is the best course of action.

I get it. It's Congress's fault that Bush & Cheney lied to everybody in
order to get approval for the war they wanted?

I guess this is the same sort of logic that Republicans follow when they
want to repeal consumer protection laws... if you buy a lemon, it must be
that you deserve it, even if the salesman lied.

DSK


That's right, it was Bush and Cheney and they all followed. Should I dig up
the video where Clinton said that Saddam had WMDs and is dangerous?

Dan J.S. wrote:
That's right, it was Bush and Cheney and they all followed. Should I dig up
the video where Clinton said that Saddam had WMDs and is dangerous?


Sure. Right after you dig up the part where Clinton started a war based
on that same info; and convinced Congress to follow along.

Why is it that when you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders are forced to where you
have to admit wrongdoing by your Fab Two, you immediately invoke
Clinton's name?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Dan J.S. wrote:
That's right, it was Bush and Cheney and they all followed. Should I dig
up the video where Clinton said that Saddam had WMDs and is dangerous?

Sure. Right after you dig up the part where Clinton started a war based on
that same info; and convinced Congress to follow along.

Why is it that when you Bush-Cheney Cheerleaders are forced to where you
have to admit wrongdoing by your Fab Two, you immediately invoke Clinton's
name?

DSK


Because Clinton let Osama get away. This is what happens when you use the
wait and see approach. You know why Saddam didnt launch anything at us?
Because we got him first.

.... invoke Clinton's
name?


Dan J.S. wrote:
Because Clinton let Osama get away.

??

How so?

Oh wait, I know... instead of bombing the aspirin factories
(funny how the American right wing now gets it's info from
Russian propaganda sources), CLinton should have accepted
Sudan's offer to hog-tie Osama and torture him for us...

1- that's a fantasy on the same level as Clinton selling
dope to school kids, which has been said by some of the
foamier-at-the-mouth Clinton-haters

2- Osama had not claimed responsibility for attacks on the
U.S. yet. Was Clinton supposed to foresee the future?

No, it's President Bush who vowed to get Osama and then let
him slip away.

Painful, but true.

... You know why Saddam didnt launch anything at us?
Because we got him first.


Really? You mean during the 8 months or so that he was on
the loose after we invaded his country, he had no
opportunity to make a phone call and say "Yes, unleash ouor
WMDs on the Americans"? It would not have taken much from
his busy schedule.

Funny how nobody with an actual real-life clue believes that
Saddam Hussein had any WMDs after the 1st Gulf War (we know
he had them before, Bush & Rumsfeld sold them to him) or
that he had any ties with Al Queda.

You may find it a lot more comfortable to stay wrapped in
your fantasy world rather than venture out here into cold
harsh reality-land.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
.... invoke Clinton's name?


Dan J.S. wrote:
Because Clinton let Osama get away.

??

How so?

Oh wait, I know... instead of bombing the aspirin factories (funny how the
American right wing now gets it's info from Russian propaganda sources),
CLinton should have accepted Sudan's offer to hog-tie Osama and torture
him for us...

1- that's a fantasy on the same level as Clinton selling dope to school
kids, which has been said by some of the foamier-at-the-mouth
Clinton-haters

2- Osama had not claimed responsibility for attacks on the U.S. yet. Was
Clinton supposed to foresee the future?

No, it's President Bush who vowed to get Osama and then let him slip away.

Painful, but true.

... You know why Saddam didnt launch anything at us? Because we got him
first.

Really? You mean during the 8 months or so that he was on the loose after
we invaded his country, he had no opportunity to make a phone call and say
"Yes, unleash ouor WMDs on the Americans"? It would not have taken much
from his busy schedule.

Funny how nobody with an actual real-life clue believes that Saddam
Hussein had any WMDs after the 1st Gulf War (we know he had them before,
Bush & Rumsfeld sold them to him) or that he had any ties with Al Queda.

You may find it a lot more comfortable to stay wrapped in your fantasy
world rather than venture out here into cold harsh reality-land.

DSK


The WMDs are in Syria or Iran.

But besides that, we also invaded Iraq to keep pressure on Saudi. We could
not lay sanctions against them directly, by invading Iraq we did an indirect
attack on Saudi. There are politics all over.

And dont talk to me about harsh reality. I spent 4 years in the Marines
(89-93) so I saw my share of what Saddam is capable off. That is harsh
reality.

You may find it a lot more comfortable to stay wrapped in your fantasy
world rather than venture out here into cold harsh reality-land.


Dan J.S. wrote:
The WMDs are in Syria or Iran.


Umm, yeah, sure they are. Can you narrow it down a bit more?


But besides that, we also invaded Iraq to keep pressure on Saudi.

I can see that you're also a great strategic genius.


... We could
not lay sanctions against them directly

Why not? Because that would interfere with the tremndous
profits accruing directly to Bush/Cheney cronies?



And dont talk to me about harsh reality. I spent 4 years in the Marines
(89-93) so I saw my share of what Saddam is capable off. That is harsh
reality.

You know what? I spent 8 years in the Navy. Friends of mine
were killed on the USS Starck. I was on a ship off the
beaches of Lebanon in 1983. These were the days when the
Bushies were playing footsie directly with Saddam Hussein.

I don't like to diss a fellow vet, but you have been
swindled and are refusing to pull your head out of the sand.
It's painful to admit a mistake (which is why President Bush
refuses to do so) but a real man can do so.

DSK

You know what? I spent 8 years in the Navy. Friends of mine were killed on
the USS Starck. I was on a ship off the beaches of Lebanon in 1983. These
were the days when the Bushies were playing footsie directly with Saddam
Hussein.


Now I see why you are the way you are. You were a squid! Explains
everything.

Dan J.S. wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Dan J.S. wrote:
By your logic, so is the entire congress and senate... because they all
agreed invading Iraq is the best course of action.

I get it. It's Congress's fault that Bush & Cheney lied to everybody in
order to get approval for the war they wanted?

I guess this is the same sort of logic that Republicans follow when they
want to repeal consumer protection laws... if you buy a lemon, it must be
that you deserve it, even if the salesman lied.

DSK


That's right, it was Bush and Cheney and they all followed. Should I dig up
the video where Clinton said that Saddam had WMDs and is dangerous?

What you and your right wing buddies fail to understand is that Bush
and Cheney had access to information other than what congress had.

On 21 Nov 2005 13:55:33 -0800, wrote:


Dan J.S. wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message
...
Dan J.S. wrote:
By your logic, so is the entire congress and senate... because they all
agreed invading Iraq is the best course of action.

I get it. It's Congress's fault that Bush & Cheney lied to everybody in
order to get approval for the war they wanted?

I guess this is the same sort of logic that Republicans follow when they
want to repeal consumer protection laws... if you buy a lemon, it must be
that you deserve it, even if the salesman lied.

DSK


That's right, it was Bush and Cheney and they all followed. Should I dig up
the video where Clinton said that Saddam had WMDs and is dangerous?

What you and your right wing buddies fail to understand is that Bush
and Cheney had access to information other than what congress had.


Pferdeäpfel !
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, beautiful bride, it's only a fetus!"

A Famous Hypocrite