In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:09:57 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , PocoLoco415
says...

Hey, jps!

What say you to the fact that Ann Richards, who let this fellow be
executed, was a Democrat?

Tail tightly tucked?

No one has the right to take someone else's life against their will,
unless it's in self-defense.

If the public safety can be preserved by keep a cocksucker locked up,
that's what should happen.

We shouldn't find out, after the fact, that someone was put to death on
false pretenses.

Like in Iraq.

jps

But jps, wasn't your post, quoted below, directed at the low-life
conservatives?


*******************************************
According to conservatives, innocent babies shouldn't be murdered but
it's okay to take another's life after birth.

Further, it's okay if you die for a cause because others before you have
died for the same cause, even if the cause has no validity. As long as
they're not unborn.

Lots of conservatives maintain these self-righteous sets of absolutes --
that's what makes me puke.

jps
**********************************************

Your jumping the gun makes me want to puke. But I guess you're just
following your hero a little too closely. ('Lemmings', someone said?)

Statement still stands. Texas has been pointed in the wrong direction
for a long time. I don't agree with any leader who sanctions a man's
death and stands by while it happens.

You conservative fruitcakes are the ones who claim the right to save the
unborn and have little if any compunction about killing those you feel
deserve it.

Conservatives align themselves far more regularly with the death penalty
than do Liberals.

The death penalty isn't pro-life.

jps