Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warmings Puts Reefs in Peril
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:55:36 GMT, "Bill McKee"
wrote: wrote in message oups.com... John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:24:18 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On 11 Nov 2005 05:07:18 -0800, wrote: Bill McKee wrote: It's the RATE of change in global temperature. Funny coincedence for you non-science christian right wingers, the rate of change in global temperature is in direct correlation with the amount of CFC's in the air.....hmmmm...... Proof? If it was so obvious, why are not all scientists, at least the hard sciences, on board? Because some are republicans, and as such, must goose step to the party of lemmings. Here's the proof you asked for: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVF...ouse_data.html If you need more, just let me know! That first site seems to say it all. Did you bother to look at it? LOL!! Di-hydrogen mono-oxide strikes again. Life's a bitch when one posts without reading! -- John H. Life's a bitch when, like you, you don't understand what you are reading. You see, dummy, it isn't the AMOUNT of any given substance in the air, it is the amount of UV penetration that the substance does and doesn't allow. So, again, you are WRONG....sorry, do some more study on the subject. \ Let me post a quote from your stated site. "vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold." Now, see if you can find the 'UV penetration' stuff on that site, 'cause that's what he was *really* talking about. No wonder Bush won, Kevin, et al, probably didn't read the ballot and voted for him. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warmings Puts Reefs in Peril
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:55:36 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:24:18 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On 11 Nov 2005 05:07:18 -0800, wrote: Bill McKee wrote: It's the RATE of change in global temperature. Funny coincedence for you non-science christian right wingers, the rate of change in global temperature is in direct correlation with the amount of CFC's in the air.....hmmmm...... Proof? If it was so obvious, why are not all scientists, at least the hard sciences, on board? Because some are republicans, and as such, must goose step to the party of lemmings. Here's the proof you asked for: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVF...ouse_data.html If you need more, just let me know! That first site seems to say it all. Did you bother to look at it? LOL!! Di-hydrogen mono-oxide strikes again. Life's a bitch when one posts without reading! -- John H. Life's a bitch when, like you, you don't understand what you are reading. You see, dummy, it isn't the AMOUNT of any given substance in the air, it is the amount of UV penetration that the substance does and doesn't allow. So, again, you are WRONG....sorry, do some more study on the subject. \ Let me post a quote from your stated site. "vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold." Now, see if you can find the 'UV penetration' stuff on that site, 'cause that's what he was *really* talking about. No wonder Bush won, Kevin, et al, probably didn't read the ballot and voted for him. -- John H. No, he won *despite* the fact that folks who did not read the ballot or understand what was at stake did not vote for him. Sort of like issues 2-5 in Ohio..............a resounding defeat of the issues yet we had dummies voting *for* them because, according to the interviews, they did not understand what the issues said or were all about. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Global Warmings Puts Reefs in Peril
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:55:36 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... John H. wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:24:18 -0500, "Bert Robbins" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On 11 Nov 2005 05:07:18 -0800, wrote: Bill McKee wrote: It's the RATE of change in global temperature. Funny coincedence for you non-science christian right wingers, the rate of change in global temperature is in direct correlation with the amount of CFC's in the air.....hmmmm...... Proof? If it was so obvious, why are not all scientists, at least the hard sciences, on board? Because some are republicans, and as such, must goose step to the party of lemmings. Here's the proof you asked for: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVF...ouse_data.html If you need more, just let me know! That first site seems to say it all. Did you bother to look at it? LOL!! Di-hydrogen mono-oxide strikes again. Life's a bitch when one posts without reading! -- John H. Life's a bitch when, like you, you don't understand what you are reading. You see, dummy, it isn't the AMOUNT of any given substance in the air, it is the amount of UV penetration that the substance does and doesn't allow. So, again, you are WRONG....sorry, do some more study on the subject. \ Let me post a quote from your stated site. "vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold." Now, see if you can find the 'UV penetration' stuff on that site, 'cause that's what he was *really* talking about. No wonder Bush won, Kevin, et al, probably didn't read the ballot and voted for him. -- John H. "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Not nice, I could have hurt myself falling off the chair. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Insurance Co Warns About Global Warming Cost | General |