OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article ,
says...

Yeah......try remembering the order and content of your conversations from a
year ago.........

Pinhead,

He had copies of notes that he turned over. Don't you think he was
smart enough to have a look at them before testifying?

Either he didn't think the investigators were smart enough to find the
evidence in his notes or he was purposefully lying to protect his boss.

Either way, the cocksucker lied.

In your book, that means he's a liberal, right?

jps

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:23:36 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...
NOYB wrote:

A policy dispute indeed! One that culminated into treason committed by
bureaucrats in State and the CIA who worked in concert to destabilize a
President.

And that is the way it is...treason by the Wilsons. They have done great
damage to America.

You are an anti-american scum.

If anyone in Clinton's administration had outed a CIA agent, you'd have
called for their head on pike pole and the outed CIA agent would have
received the congressional medal of honor, a concert played for them at
the Kennedy Center featuring the marches of John Phillips Souza and a
lifetime supply of 24 hour security.

You're ****ing insane Snippy.

jps

Anyone in the Clinton administration outing a CIA agent would deserve all you
suggest. The same is true for anyone in the Bush administration. No one in
either administration has been shown to have done so.

So, why are you calling names?
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

HK

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:13:39 -0800, jps wrote:

In article et,
says...

Obstruction for What?
Libby is charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed.

Then why lie?

If Scooter had nothing to hide, why lie?

TO A GRAND JURY??? Was Scooter asleep during Clinton's second term?

Clinton didn't commit a crime. He certainly was guilty of indiscretion
but philandering isn't a crime.

Were you unhappy when he was prosecuted for lying under oath?

jps

Has anyone proven yet that Libby lied?
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

HK

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article . net,
says...

Leon Panetta made this point very strongly last night on the News Hour with
Jim Lehrer. He also went on to say that *anyone* in the Administratoin who
gets indicted should resign their post until their name is cleared.
Unfortunately, Lehrer missed this meatball lobbed right over the plate. A
sharper host would have asked Leon why he didn't favor this strategy for
*his* boss just 7 years ago?

Lehrer is above that, which is why he's the anchor and you drill stanky
teeth.

I disagree with Panetta and haven't the slightest idea why anyone who
hasn't been convicted, much less indicted, should give up his post. The
matter of resignation should be between themselves and their bosses.

It's an affront to our system of jurisprudence and the presumption of
innocence. That said, the Republicans are awfully quick to condemn
people, even when presumed innocent.

That they eat their own isn't surprising.

jps

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:00:53 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

Yeah......try remembering the order and content of your conversations from a
year ago.........

Pinhead,

He had copies of notes that he turned over. Don't you think he was
smart enough to have a look at them before testifying?

Either he didn't think the investigators were smart enough to find the
evidence in his notes or he was purposefully lying to protect his boss.

Either way, the cocksucker lied.

In your book, that means he's a liberal, right?

jps

Now you're throwing 'cocksucker' into the fray. My gosh, what do you guys do
with each other?
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

HK

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...

His testimony doesn't square with his own notes, contemporaneously
recorded when Cheney told him about Valerie Plame.

He testified that Russert told him about Plame...not the other way around.

And his notes show that Cheney told him about Plame at least several
weeks prior to Russert.

He also testified that he told Russert that he didn't know it to be true or
not. Did he lie to Russert? Perhaps.

Who care? Folks in this administration lie all the time.

Did he lie to Fitzgerald? Maybe

Oh yeah. Sho enoff.

not. But is it a crime to lie to a news reporter?

No, and he's not being charged for lying to a news reporter. He's being
charged for lying to the investigators of the leak.

Especially a reporter who
is fishing for a story by pretending to know the answer to the questions
he's asking?

Oh jeez, Scooter went to college and became a lawyer. He's been at the
top of his game for quite some time. You feel sorry for him because a
reporter asked him leading questions?

Whew.

I expect our president is that stupid but not the folks surrounding him.

jps

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...

Leon Panetta made this point very strongly last night on the News Hour
with
Jim Lehrer. He also went on to say that *anyone* in the Administratoin
who
gets indicted should resign their post until their name is cleared.
Unfortunately, Lehrer missed this meatball lobbed right over the plate.
A
sharper host would have asked Leon why he didn't favor this strategy for
*his* boss just 7 years ago?

Lehrer is above that, which is why he's the anchor and you drill stanky
teeth.

I disagree with Panetta and haven't the slightest idea why anyone who
hasn't been convicted, much less indicted, should give up his post. The
matter of resignation should be between themselves and their bosses.

I'm sure Panetta felt that way 7 years ago. He's only 67, so it can't be
that he's getting old and losing his memory.

When I heard him say it, I thought to myself "what a hypocrite!".

But I agree with you on this for the most part.

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:00:53 -0800, jps wrote:

In article ,
says...

Yeah......try remembering the order and content of your conversations from a
year ago.........

Pinhead,

He had copies of notes that he turned over. Don't you think he was
smart enough to have a look at them before testifying?

Either he didn't think the investigators were smart enough to find the
evidence in his notes or he was purposefully lying to protect his boss.

Either way, the cocksucker lied.

In your book, that means he's a liberal, right?

jps

Now you're throwing 'cocksucker' into the fray. My gosh, what do you guys do
with each other?

It's a Deadwood thing. Ever watch it? Brilliant writing. Lots of
cussing. Favorite word around town is cocksucker.

If you haven't seen it, the first and second seasons are out on DVD.
Incredibly well done with a great cast.

jps

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:23:36 -0800, jps wrote:

In article , says...
NOYB wrote:

A policy dispute indeed! One that culminated into treason committed by
bureaucrats in State and the CIA who worked in concert to destabilize a
President.

And that is the way it is...treason by the Wilsons. They have done great
damage to America.

You are an anti-american scum.

If anyone in Clinton's administration had outed a CIA agent, you'd have
called for their head on pike pole and the outed CIA agent would have
received the congressional medal of honor, a concert played for them at
the Kennedy Center featuring the marches of John Phillips Souza and a
lifetime supply of 24 hour security.

You're ****ing insane Snippy.

jps

Anyone in the Clinton administration outing a CIA agent would deserve all you
suggest. The same is true for anyone in the Bush administration. No one in
either administration has been shown to have done so.

So, why are you calling names?

My rectal sphincter tightens when Snippy makes his outlandish claims
that he just read on his fave White Power website.

jps

OT--Charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed?
 

In article , PocoLoco415
@hotmail.com says...
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:13:39 -0800, jps wrote:

In article et,
says...

Obstruction for What?
Libby is charged with lying about a crime that wasn't committed.

Then why lie?

If Scooter had nothing to hide, why lie?

TO A GRAND JURY??? Was Scooter asleep during Clinton's second term?

Clinton didn't commit a crime. He certainly was guilty of indiscretion
but philandering isn't a crime.

Were you unhappy when he was prosecuted for lying under oath?

jps

Has anyone proven yet that Libby lied?

It's pretty clear from what Fitzgerald has said. His testimony directly
conflicts with his contemporaneous notes about Cheney informing him of
Plame.

It's pretty obvious he was protecting something or someone.

jps