Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "OlBlueEyes" wrote in message ... " *JimH*" wrote in : "OlBlueEyes" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in k.net: "bb" wrote in message news ![]() As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no weight. BS. bb BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting them as fact, and of creative editing of content. Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article (including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual. OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being quoted. Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited without posting a link to it. This is especially true when that person has a history of editing articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being original. Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one sitting. Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my comments is beyond me. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush's flawed reason for war resurfaces | General |