On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:30:24 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:43:04 -0500, "P Fritz"
wrote:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote in
:

My problem with this guy is that he is out of the mainstream. I
think
all judges should be more or less apolitical, and middle of the
road.

Like Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg, former legal counsel for the ACLU?

For liebrals like harry, living in their fantasy land.......anyone
that
doesn't agree with their myopic views is out of the mainstream.

Fortunately, less than 25% of the country defines themsleves as libral.



unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.

If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.

You can always spot a liebral by the "Hate America" viewpoint.
As they become more marginalized, they become more and more shrill.


i wasnt aware that loving freedom meant hating america

you conservatives have a strange view both of freedom and of america

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote in
:

The real question for any SC nominee is.........will you base your
decisions on the Constitution of the United States (and Amendments)
and what the founders originally intended?

Cite please? How the hell do you know what the original founders
intended?

Start with the Federalist Papers.

And a dictionary.

And the Constitution.

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:07:42 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
.. .

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)


yeah i know. who needs freedom in america.

as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the
jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like
scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the
extermination of the jews.

it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did Martin Luther pronounce 'xtians'?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:12:25 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:07:42 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
. ..

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)


yeah i know. who needs freedom in america.

as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the
jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like
scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the
extermination of the jews.

it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did Martin Luther pronounce 'xtians'?

--

dig him up and ask him. of course, since he invented hoch deutsch, you
better bone up on it.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

On 2 Nov 2005 11:05:05 -0800, wrote:


NOYB wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:27:52 GMT, (Bob) wrote:

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:09:10 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:



Judges should *enforce* the law, not make it......that is the legislators
job. Unfortunately the liberal justices have deiced to do otherwise.

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

How did he pronounce 'xtians' when he made the statement?

LOL.

When idiots are confused and addled, they tend to laugh nervously.

or swear uncontrollably.

On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:48:40 GMT, OlBlueEyes
wrote:

(Bob) wrote in
:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:25:10 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message


unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.

If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.


of that i have no doubt.

Then you admit that your original statement was idiotic. Thank you.

au contraire. what i admit is that conservatives would willingly kill
those with whom they disagree...as they so often have.

sorry the message went over your head. perhaps if you laid down when
reading...

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 01:48:40 GMT, OlBlueEyes
wrote:

(Bob) wrote in
:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:25:10 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message


unfortunately it's proof that america is more isolated in its
knowledge of the world, and more susceptible to the blather of the far
right...america is, in a sense, a christian saudi arabia.

If it were, we'd have cut your head off already.


of that i have no doubt.

Then you admit that your original statement was idiotic. Thank you.

au contraire. what i admit is that conservatives would willingly kill
those with whom they disagree...as they so often have.


Yes, you are indeed an idiot.

OBE,
Three points I would like to make. If thunder makes a mistake, but does not
realize it is a mistake, he is not a liar. Secondly, when you use the "F"
word it does nothing to further your cause, it makes you sound uneducated,
and in your inability to chose the right word, you were forced to use the
"F" word. Lastly, when you use profanity it makes you sound like Kevin
Noble and Harry. The last point alone is enough for me to refrain from
using profanity in my posts.


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote in
:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:22:09 +0000, OlBlueEyes wrote:

thunder wrote in
:

The real question for any SC nominee is.........will you base your
decisions on the Constitution of the United States (and Amendments)
and what the founders originally intended?

Cite please? How the hell do you know what the original founders
intended?

Start with the Federalist Papers.

Oh please, I have read them. Perhaps, you might need a
refresher. The role of the judiciary is to interpret the law.

I will send you a certified check for $50,000 if you can tell me the
Article, Section and Clause of the Constitution containing the word
"interpret".

Article:
Section:
Clause:

Didn't think so.

Therefore,

Since the Constitution defines what the role of each branch of government
is, and since the word "interpret" is nowhere to be found therein, you're
a ****ing liar.

Bob,
When did MLK say the Jews were lucky to have Christians as overlords?


"Bob" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:23:14 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Bob" wrote in message
.. .

wasn't aware scalia was a liberal. he recently said that, since xtians
make up 85% of the population, they have the right to have their
religious views be part of the govt, and minorities (jews, atheists,
etc), basically are out of luck

sounds like law making to me.

Pardon me for being skeptical, but I'd like to read a transcript of his
actual words, instead of your paraphrasing.

fine. it was his dissent in the 'mccreary' decision:


Nope. You included Jews as some of the folks who are "out of luck".
However, Judaism is a montheistic religion. As is Christianity and Islam.

But you're right...
tough titties to the atheists and polytheists! ;-)


yeah i know. who needs freedom in america.

as to the jews, well this is how martin luther started...he told the
jews how lucky they were to have xtians as their overlords...just like
scalia did. by the time of his death he was calling for the
extermination of the jews.

it's a christian thing. you wouldn't understand

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 05:41:14 -0500, "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about
my Phd @ Diploma Mill .com wrote:

Bob,
When did MLK say the Jews were lucky to have Christians as overlords?

not MLK, but martin luther...


---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field