| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. Kevin once again shows why he maintains the title of "King of the NG idiots" |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. Oh, so now in order to spin, you find lowest of the low numbers from any poll, then match them to the highest low number for Bush from any poll. Nice. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. Oh, so now in order to spin, you find lowest of the low numbers from any poll, then match them to the highest low number for Bush from any poll. Nice. The lowest Bush approval rating in *any* of the polls is 37%...and it came in a CBS News poll. The lowest Clinton approval rating according to *Gallup* was 37%. If you want a true apples to apples comparison, then let's look at Gallup's lowest-ever number for Bush: 40%...which is three points higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
NOYB wrote: wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. Oh, so now in order to spin, you find lowest of the low numbers from any poll, then match them to the highest low number for Bush from any poll. Nice. The lowest Bush approval rating in *any* of the polls is 37%...and it came in a CBS News poll. The lowest Clinton approval rating according to *Gallup* was 37%. If you want a true apples to apples comparison, then let's look at Gallup's lowest-ever number for Bush: 40%...which is three points higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating. A "true apples to apples comparison" would be each and every poll for Clinton, through his first and second terms, compared to each and every poll for Bush, through his first and second terms. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message ups.com... NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... P Fritz wrote: wrote in message oups.com... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9672058/ Big deal......look at the last several president's lowest numbers. Table 1. Presidential Approval Ratings, 1953-1999 (11) President Average (%) High (%) Low (%) Kennedy 70 83 56 Eisenhower 65 79 48 Bush 61 89 29 Johnson 55 79 35 Clinton 54 73 37 Reagan 53 65 35 Nixon 49 67 24 Ford 47 71 37 Carter 45 74 28 http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...109025096/pg_4 Good point for once, **** for brains! The only two anywhere NEAR are Nixon, and Carter!!! Clinton was at 37% at one point in his Presidency...which matches CBS's current number. Oh, so now in order to spin, you find lowest of the low numbers from any poll, then match them to the highest low number for Bush from any poll. Nice. The lowest Bush approval rating in *any* of the polls is 37%...and it came in a CBS News poll. The lowest Clinton approval rating according to *Gallup* was 37%. If you want a true apples to apples comparison, then let's look at Gallup's lowest-ever number for Bush: 40%...which is three points higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating. A "true apples to apples comparison" would be each and every poll for Clinton, through his first and second terms, compared to each and every poll for Bush, through his first and second terms. Of course. But lacking the necessary data, we have to work with what we have. According to Gallup: Bush's lowest-ever approval rating was 40%. Clinton's lowest-ever approval rating was 37% |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:07:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Bush's lowest-ever approval rating was 40%. Clinton's lowest-ever approval rating was 37% Yeah, but Clinton's lowest numbers were in the early days of his first term. I'll guarantee Bush wishes he had Clinton's second term numbers, Monica and all. http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/fi...7_image001.gif |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:07:16 +0000, NOYB wrote: Bush's lowest-ever approval rating was 40%. Clinton's lowest-ever approval rating was 37% Yeah, but Clinton's lowest numbers were in the early days of his first term. I'll guarantee Bush wishes he had Clinton's second term numbers, Monica and all. http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/fi...7_image001.gif Historically, Presidents never have had good approval ratings during a war (except for Bush 41). When you compound the war with the fact that gas is 50% higher than just a year or two ago, it's amazing that Bush isn't in the 20's. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:47:53 +0000, NOYB wrote:
The lowest Bush approval rating in *any* of the polls is 37%...and it came in a CBS News poll. The lowest Clinton approval rating according to *Gallup* was 37%. If you want a true apples to apples comparison, then let's look at Gallup's lowest-ever number for Bush: 40%...which is three points higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating. Spin it any way you want, but let's look at Bush's data historically. Any President has normal gains and ebbs in their approval. A gradual rise, means that people who at one time disapproved, are now approving. The rises are gradual, as we each make our mind of at different rates. The opposite is also true, approval turning to disapproval. Spikes, on the other hand, are generally major events, that change peoples mind rapidly. Here's Bush's historical data graphed: http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm You'll notice, there aren't *any* gradual upturns, only spikes. The gradual trend is down, down, down. People who once approved of Bush are turning away. The only question is, when his base finally kicks in. You know the base, people like you, NOYB, those with unfaltering loyalty to this President. The curtain is open, the honeymoon is over, where is Bush's base. I'm guessing, somewhere between Carter and Nixon. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:47:53 +0000, NOYB wrote: The lowest Bush approval rating in *any* of the polls is 37%...and it came in a CBS News poll. The lowest Clinton approval rating according to *Gallup* was 37%. If you want a true apples to apples comparison, then let's look at Gallup's lowest-ever number for Bush: 40%...which is three points higher than Clinton's lowest approval rating. Spin it any way you want, but let's look at Bush's data historically. Any President has normal gains and ebbs in their approval. A gradual rise, means that people who at one time disapproved, are now approving. The rises are gradual, as we each make our mind of at different rates. The opposite is also true, approval turning to disapproval. Spikes, on the other hand, are generally major events, that change peoples mind rapidly. Here's Bush's historical data graphed: http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm Do you have a link for any historical data graphs of other recent Presidents? You'll notice, there aren't *any* gradual upturns, only spikes. The gradual trend is down, down, down. People who once approved of Bush are turning away. Ironically, his numbers fell right after he pitched the $200 billion for New Orleans, and then again after the Miers' nomination. Abandoning his base has hurt him much worse than when he sticks to his guns. The only question is, when his base finally kicks in. You know the base, people like you, NOYB, those with unfaltering loyalty to this President. His base is there when he needs them. It's just that right now they're showing their displeasure with his "caving in" on several important issues to most Conservatives. The curtain is open, the honeymoon is over, where is Bush's base. I'm guessing, somewhere between Carter and Nixon. See above. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| It could happen to you. | General | |||
| Riding the slide | General | |||
| My Great Encounter with Hawaiian Tropic Babes | General | |||
| Anti-Americans All | General | |||