![]() |
It could happen to you.
|
It could happen to you.
|
It could happen to you.
On 9 Oct 2005 17:41:45 -0700, wrote:
PocoLoco wrote: On 9 Oct 2005 12:25:42 -0700, wrote: JIMinFL wrote: "PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:18:54 GMT, "JIMinFL" wrote: Bush basher kicked off plane. http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html Maybe she'd have been kicked off if she were wearing the same shirt with Kerry/Edwards on it? Ever think of that? I'll bet she would have, but it wouldn't happen. Trash talk is a liberal Democrat thing. It's easy enough to see evidence of that in this NG. All the right wingers are so polite, well mannered, unconfrontational. None of them would ever troll a thread like this through a boating NG, just to get his/her rocks off on dissing a "Bush Basher"...... I think none of the conservatives were as crude as your comment above. But, you've had some good examples with another name caller in the group. -- You think none of the conservatives would ever troll a thread like this through a boating NG, just to get his/her rocks off by dissing "Bush bashers"? ROTFLAMO I would just *swear* that is exactly what happened here. :-) But then again I could be wrong, as one of the polite, well-mannered, non-trash talking conservatives responded to my comments (that included an opinion that the woman was "wrong" to wear that shirt) with a charge that I'm morally deficient. Probably too morally deficient to recognize a polite, constructive, conciliatory post when I see one. Oddball set of standards you guys use over there in Rightieville. Most folks were discussing the wording on the gal's T-shirt, Chuck, not 'getting their rocks off'. You're quickly approaching the Harry/Kevin modus operandi. -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
It could happen to you.
Eisboch wrote:
Did you notice the survey results on the referenced web site? When I checked it, 51% agreed with the airline, 49% agreed with the woman (out of over 6,000 respondents). What was the popular vote percentages of the last POTUS election? Sounds familiar. Sounds like a mandate to boot the woman off the plane at 35,000 feet. DSK |
It could happen to you.
"DSK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Did you notice the survey results on the referenced web site? When I checked it, 51% agreed with the airline, 49% agreed with the woman (out of over 6,000 respondents). What was the popular vote percentages of the last POTUS election? Sounds familiar. Sounds like a mandate to boot the woman off the plane at 35,000 feet. As long as you are pre-breathing O2 for one our before takeoff. |
It could happen to you.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... I think it perfectly appropriate to wear clothing that says F*ck Bush, if one feels like doing that. And the mudrats on your plane were simply exercising their right to free speech and expression. So what's the problem? Eisboch Also, you don't have to look at a tee-shirt; it is easy enough to avoid. Not necessarily so. You cannot avoid the damned noise these brats made. I would have stuck one of the parents and both kids in the rest room after an hour of non-stop whining and crying. Even before I had kids of my own, I was sympathetic to the parents of children who had difficulty flying. I was never sympathetic to cranky old men who interact socially as if they had to carry a mouthful of tart lemon wherever they go. I'm sorry you had a rough flight. I'm also sorry for the parents of the crying children who probably had a rougher flight based on your description. |
It could happen to you.
"Don White" wrote in message ... Bryan wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Harry Krause wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: Harry Krause wrote in message ... JIMinFL wrote: Bush basher kicked off plane. http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html The woman was right; the airline was wrong. Nope. Airlines have the right to refuse service to anyone who, in their judgment, is inappropriately dressed, intoxicated or otherwise in violation of their policies. The problem here was not the images. It was the "word". Good for them! The woman can complain all she wants but airlines can set their own standards. Eisboch Airline? Standards? Surely you jest. On my flight back from Hawai'i to San Francisco, two rows in front of me, there was a couple incapable of controlling their crying, screaming brats. The two kids whined all the way back to the mainland, for four and a half hours. without letup. I asked one of the flight attendants to ask the couple to either control their brats or to move them to a less-occupied part of the plane. She refused. At least 20 other passengers complained. Those brats were more offense than anyone's shirt. Crying kids are part of our world Harry and, although annoying to you, are not unique. I've flew many miles in my working days and crying babies and bratty kids where often part of the experience. On occasion I even had my own crying baby along. Your standards for travel are too high for commercial airlines. Buy your own jet. Eisboch Hey, I'm not talking about a half hour of crying and screaming; these two brats would not shut up the entire trip. Then, Harry, the most likely explanation is that they were in pain. The parents probably should have given the kids a drink. Swallowing helps equalize the air pressure in the inner ear. I swear I'm not attacking you personally, Harry, but I can't pass this one by, .... maybe the parents should have given Harry a drink or two. |
It could happen to you.
PocoLoco wrote: On 9 Oct 2005 17:41:45 -0700, wrote: PocoLoco wrote: On 9 Oct 2005 12:25:42 -0700, wrote: JIMinFL wrote: "PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 13:18:54 GMT, "JIMinFL" wrote: Bush basher kicked off plane. http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html Maybe she'd have been kicked off if she were wearing the same shirt with Kerry/Edwards on it? Ever think of that? I'll bet she would have, but it wouldn't happen. Trash talk is a liberal Democrat thing. It's easy enough to see evidence of that in this NG. All the right wingers are so polite, well mannered, unconfrontational. None of them would ever troll a thread like this through a boating NG, just to get his/her rocks off on dissing a "Bush Basher"...... I think none of the conservatives were as crude as your comment above. But, you've had some good examples with another name caller in the group. -- You think none of the conservatives would ever troll a thread like this through a boating NG, just to get his/her rocks off by dissing "Bush bashers"? ROTFLAMO I would just *swear* that is exactly what happened here. :-) But then again I could be wrong, as one of the polite, well-mannered, non-trash talking conservatives responded to my comments (that included an opinion that the woman was "wrong" to wear that shirt) with a charge that I'm morally deficient. Probably too morally deficient to recognize a polite, constructive, conciliatory post when I see one. Oddball set of standards you guys use over there in Rightieville. Most folks were discussing the wording on the gal's T-shirt, Chuck, not 'getting their rocks off'. You're quickly approaching the Harry/Kevin modus operandi. -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan Excellent technique, John. When you can't counter the basic argument, object to the verbiage used in a single phrase. Conclude with a derogatory personal comment. Of course, this hasn't been effective in a couple of thousand years of debating issues- but any port in a storm, I suppose. |
It could happen to you.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 01:40:41 GMT, "Bryan" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... I think it perfectly appropriate to wear clothing that says F*ck Bush, if one feels like doing that. And the mudrats on your plane were simply exercising their right to free speech and expression. So what's the problem? Eisboch Also, you don't have to look at a tee-shirt; it is easy enough to avoid. Not necessarily so. You cannot avoid the damned noise these brats made. I would have stuck one of the parents and both kids in the rest room after an hour of non-stop whining and crying. Even before I had kids of my own, I was sympathetic to the parents of children who had difficulty flying. I was never sympathetic to cranky old men who interact socially as if they had to carry a mouthful of tart lemon wherever they go. I'm sorry you had a rough flight. I'm also sorry for the parents of the crying children who probably had a rougher flight based on your description. Be nice. Imagine being Harry and unable to call anyone names or bash Bush all the way from Honolulu to Minneapolis. That was probably worse than my first overseas flight after they banned smoking on airplanes. I'm still surprised I didn't try to disable the smoke detector in the restroom! -- John H "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com