"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
NOYB wrote:

Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time.
Hawaiian
Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter
periods of
time.
Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend
this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are
beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest
their
money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped?
Hey, take it up with Harry...not me. He's the one who was feeling all
sorry for them since they won't be attending college. I think it's
perfectly acceptable for a woman to sleep her way into money.



Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian
Tropic
girls.
I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200
cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000, and
that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl.
Wow! $10k! What do the losers get?


Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling
jobs.
Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more
experience
you have, and the brighter you get.
People don't get brighter with time. Sure, you develop more
experience as time elapses...but dim bulbs who have worked somewhere
for a long time are just dim bulbs with even more experience at being
dim.

And Harry is the one who said that the ones that he met weren't
particularly bright.
No, I was not impressed with their intellectual assets. I'm not saying
they were dumb. They just weren't very sharp.

Who really cares? I'm a true believer in the fact that God bestowed
certain "talents" on each and every individual. Those girls' talent is
the fact that they're hot. They might as well use that talent now, and
earn money through beauty pageants, modelling, and snagging themselves
a rich guy while they can.

Smart and hot are not mutually exclusive. If they're smart *and*
beautiful, then they should use that deadly combo to reach the pinnacle
of whatever career they choose.

Oh, I don't begrudge them making some bucks using their looks. Why not?

Consider if you were in their position. You'd never pay for a drink at a
bar. You'd never have to touch a dirty door handle. You'd always have a
seat in a crowded room. You'd never starve for attention. You'd be
every man's favorite co-worker. Etc.


Maybe you should hire one as a dental assistant.

My wife wouldn't like that very much. But it might help correct the huge
imbalance of female patients vs. male patients that I see.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.

Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered. That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job in
the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.

It also explains the Kennedy types, and the hollywood crowd.

NOYB,
Is it possible you have more female patients due to your "additional"
services you provide for free?


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
NOYB wrote:

Some have high earning power, but for very short periods of time.
Hawaiian
Tropic girls have moderate earning power...and for even shorter
periods of
time.
Now, I know that you being a rightie and all, you can't comprehend
this, but, just because they are women, and just because they are
beautiful, doesn't mean that they don't have the brains to invest
their
money properly. Think Naomi Campbell is financially strapped?
Hey, take it up with Harry...not me. He's the one who was feeling
all sorry for them since they won't be attending college. I think
it's perfectly acceptable for a woman to sleep her way into money.



Secondly, please show what you know about the wages of Hawaiian
Tropic
girls.
I know this, that at many venues where they appear, there is a $200
cover charge! And when they are picked, the winners get $10,000,
and
that's before they ever make an appearance as a Tropic girl.
Wow! $10k! What do the losers get?


Thirdly, they usually go on to bigger and better paying modelling
jobs.
Just like about any job, your earning power goes up the more
experience
you have, and the brighter you get.
People don't get brighter with time. Sure, you develop more
experience as time elapses...but dim bulbs who have worked somewhere
for a long time are just dim bulbs with even more experience at
being dim.

And Harry is the one who said that the ones that he met weren't
particularly bright.
No, I was not impressed with their intellectual assets. I'm not
saying they were dumb. They just weren't very sharp.

Who really cares? I'm a true believer in the fact that God bestowed
certain "talents" on each and every individual. Those girls' talent
is the fact that they're hot. They might as well use that talent now,
and earn money through beauty pageants, modelling, and snagging
themselves a rich guy while they can.

Smart and hot are not mutually exclusive. If they're smart *and*
beautiful, then they should use that deadly combo to reach the
pinnacle of whatever career they choose.

Oh, I don't begrudge them making some bucks using their looks. Why not?

Consider if you were in their position. You'd never pay for a drink at
a bar. You'd never have to touch a dirty door handle. You'd always
have a seat in a crowded room. You'd never starve for attention. You'd
be every man's favorite co-worker. Etc.


Maybe you should hire one as a dental assistant.

My wife wouldn't like that very much. But it might help correct the huge
imbalance of female patients vs. male patients that I see.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not name-calling
at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job
in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.



Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to a
college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.

Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
o-worker. Etc.


Maybe you should hire one as a dental assistant.

Or at least start her off as a receptionist....then if she's willing,
provide support to help her advance.

Oddly, most receptionists start off as dental assistants and choose to move
to the front office...not the other way around.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
o-worker. Etc.


Maybe you should hire one as a dental assistant.

Or at least start her off as a receptionist....then if she's willing,
provide support to help her advance.


There you go...and I am sure it would promote marital bliss in NOYB's
household...

Way back when, I worked for an ad agency run by a real genius of the
business, EXCEPT...he kept hiring gorgeous secretaries and then started
sleeping with them, and his wives kept finding out. Why? Because each of
his three wives (when I knew him) had worked at the agency as his
secretary.

I have a friend who married one of his patients. Years later, in casual
conversation he confided in her that he used to look down her blouse every
time she came in to have dental work done. Big mistake! She automatically
(and probably correctly so) assumed that he looked down the shirts of all
his attractive female patients.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, he's trying to claim that people get brighter with time and
experience. People are either smart or dumb. Time and experience
will
not change that.


An interesting viewpoint. So what is your opinion of all the
neo-conservatives who claim they used to be liberals, but got smarter?


NOYB wrote:
They got wiser, not smarter.

Wisdom is intelligence paired with experience.


Good backpedal, with rhythm.
Let's see those judges cards: 9.2 9.4 8.8



Liberals who stay liberal throughout their lives are either dumb or
sheltered.

Hmm. That's certainly a reasonable, rational, assessment, not
name-calling
at all nosirree!

... That is why all of those liberal college professors remain as
liberals throughout their lives...because they've never held a real job
in the real world. They're not dumb...but certainly sheltered.


And the conservative college professors?

Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.



Let's just suppose that since you owe your current (claimed, but I'm not
disputing you just making sure the facts are on the board) profession to
a
college education, the people who made it possible for you don't have
"real jobs"? I suppose their contribution to the economy... macro or on
the NOYB micro scale... is totally negligible?

The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.

Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.

Exactly......the best preof I had were the part timers that were "in" the
profession.......the worst were the ones that had never worked a day in
their lives......having gone straight from graduation to teaching........and
many of them are still there.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry Krause wrote:
o-worker. Etc.


Maybe you should hire one as a dental assistant.

Or at least start her off as a receptionist....then if she's willing,
provide support to help her advance.

Oddly, most receptionists start off as dental assistants and choose to
move
to the front office...not the other way around.



That is true of my denist's office.

And the conservative college professors?


NOBBY wrote:
Most have held a job in the business world...or lived an equally sheltered
life but were raised in a Republican household.


I see... in NOBBY-World, only conservative college professors have ever
held jobs outside academia, and children of Republicans always grow up
to be conservatives...

Wait a minute, wasn't it you that pointed out something about Darwin and
pangenesis?



The best instructors at the dental school also held part-time faculty
practices.


I think that's true in any field. Certainly in engineering & medicine.
And yet, somehow about 99% of the engineering profs I currently know are
pretty strongly anti-Bush/Cheney. Does that make them "sheltered liberals"?




Teaching is a noble profession. But at the college level, a good teacher
needs real world experience to truly be effective.


Agreed, and IMHO experience in the field is necessary for anything above
the grammar school level.

BTW please read the current Jane Bryan Quinn column about the housing
market. She's right on the money.

DSK

"Starbuck's Words of Wisdom" wrote in message
...
NOYB,
Is it possible you have more female patients due to your "additional"
services you provide for free?

Naww. There are several reasons why I believe that I see many more women
than men:

1) A lot of dentistry is elective today. Women are much more likely to have
cosmetic work done.

2) Women live longer. Many of the female patients are recently widowed.

3) Men usually wait until something hurts or falls out before going to the
doctor/dentist