"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:05:55 GMT, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

And the fact that there is
a normally operating ferry with a large wake, should require the tour boat
to take care for such.


Not according to any Admiralty Law I am familiar with.... do you have
any other information.....?

--

_ ___c
\ _| \_
__\_| oooo \_____
~~~~|______________/ ~~~~~
~~~ ~~~~~~
~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
~~~~ }((((o ~~~~~~ }{{{{o ~~~~~~~

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/
Homepage*
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide

Nope, just when you go in front of a jury, and try to put all the blame on a
big boat with big wake, that you did not see the boat, and that 50 people on
a 40' boat is safe in an area where there is a large ferry operating. The
jury may find the tour operator more negligent. Whatever, there will be
large payouts in the future.