| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
OT--The CIA should have told the VP?
NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message news  On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:46:27 -0400, John Gaquin wrote: It's clear he took a number of copies, plus the notes he had contemporaneously generated, which were also supposed to be subject to censorship. But I understood from reports that there are, in fact, a small number of originals now unaccounted for. On further reading, I believe you are right. I found this: "The missing documents involve two or three draft versions of the report as it was evolving and being refined by the Clinton administration, officials and lawyers say. The Archives is believed to have copies of some of the missing documents." Still, as they are draft versions, it's criminal, but unlikely revisionist. http://news.lawinfo.com/story/3_ds_34549.cfm Today, I went back and read the transcript of Berger's testimony before the 9/11 commission from March 24th, 2004. An interesting exchange took place between Commission member Fielding and Mr. Berger, in which they were discussing the "after-action" report from the time period between December '98 and mid-'99. I believe this is the same after-action report You believe? Based on what? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| REPUBLICANS ARE TRAITORS! | General | |||
| Clinton Told Bush That Bin Laden Top Security Threat | General | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
Threaded Mode
