On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:46:27 -0400, John Gaquin wrote:


It's clear he took a number of copies, plus the notes he had
contemporaneously generated, which were also supposed to be subject to
censorship. But I understood from reports that there are, in fact, a
small number of originals now unaccounted for.

On further reading, I believe you are right. I found this:

"The missing documents involve two or three draft versions of the report
as it was evolving and being refined by the Clinton administration,
officials and lawyers say. The Archives is believed to have copies of some
of the missing documents."

Still, as they are draft versions, it's criminal, but unlikely revisionist.

http://news.lawinfo.com/story/3_ds_34549.cfm