![]() |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"JAXAshby" wrote in message you most certainly did, when you said *you* can navigate using just a compass and speed indicator. See above post |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
john, that means you are back peddling? yeah, it does.
From: "John Gaquin" Date: 7/22/2004 12:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: "JAXAshby" wrote in message you most certainly did, when you said *you* can navigate using just a compass and speed indicator. See above post |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
it is illegal to fly a 747 DR.
From: "John Gaquin" Date: 7/22/2004 12:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: "JAXAshby" wrote in message no, you have not. a 727 is NEVER flown DR. knock it off. You would know. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JAXAshby wrote:
shen, stay out of this discussion. Discussion? With you? Please. You're an unreconstructed, know-nothing asshole with a crappy little sailboat that should have been taken to the dumpster years ago. -- "There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
Subject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation From: (JAXAshby) shen, stay out of this discussion. the basics are way beyond you. next, you will be telling us *you* wondered around a rocky channel in a fog with just a compass and a knotmeter and used your incredible skill to get very lucky and not hit anything therefore you were not lucky at all. same same arguement used by drunk drivers. Been trying to come up with an intelligent response for quite a bit of time, I see. Maybe you should have thought some more, cause ya didn't make it. Read all the manuals, books, etc., you want jaxass, but until you get out there and actually use that stuff, all you'll be is someone who can quote definitions. Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog. However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass, tach, and watch, with no problems .... does that count? Shen |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog.
However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass, tach, and watch, with no problems .... does that count? Shen only in the stew ped department, shen. only in the stew ped dept. you dumb squat, you have no idea how lucky you were. like the drunk driver who made it home through traffic. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
ubject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation From: "Gene Kearns" Date: 08/07/2004 11:22 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: On 21 Jul 2004 19:06:10 GMT, (Shen44) wrote: (JAXAshby) Date: 07/21/2004 05:38 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: shen, Denver to Mpls non-stop at night is not a daysail. Interesting. So, you've navigated a plane, once, as the person in charge of navigation, over land.... not the most experienced at this, are you. In truth, I wasn't interested in some aircraft navigation. Although the basics are the same there are a number of differences in the details and dem details can get you "dead". Next question. How many known channels have you navigated in fog? Shen If you get an answer to that one, I kinda like to know how many channels he has navigated in a known fog?? As passenger or navigator? As navigator, none. He hasn't the skills needed. Shen |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JAXAshby wrote: shen, stay out of this discussion. Discussion? With you? Please. You're an unreconstructed, know-nothing asshole with a crappy little sailboat that should have been taken to the dumpster years ago. As opposed to Harry, who is a know it all boatless old child molester that will be sleeping in a dumpster shortly.... |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
ubject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation From: (JAXAshby) Date: 08/07/2004 10:57 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog. However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass, tach, and watch, with no problems .... does that count? Shen only in the stew ped department, shen. only in the stew ped dept. you dumb squat, you have no idea how lucky you were. like the drunk driver who made it home through traffic. Only an idiot would discount luck, totally, but there's a difference between relying on luck alone and using ALL the information available to get the job done. Since you are a product of GPS, I would not expect you to understand how this could be done regularly with less danger than allowing YOU to run the same channel WITH a GPS on a clear day. Shen |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com