BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/5615-why-word-%22dead%22-not-used-context-deduced-navigation.html)

John Gaquin July 22nd 04 05:35 AM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 

"JAXAshby" wrote in message

you most certainly did, when you said *you* can navigate using just a

compass
and speed indicator.



See above post



JAXAshby August 7th 04 02:59 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
john, that means you are back peddling? yeah, it does.

From: "John Gaquin"
Date: 7/22/2004 12:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:


"JAXAshby" wrote in message

you most certainly did, when you said *you* can navigate using just a

compass
and speed indicator.



See above post











JAXAshby August 7th 04 03:30 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
it is illegal to fly a 747 DR.

From: "John Gaquin"
Date: 7/22/2004 12:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:


"JAXAshby" wrote in message

no, you have not. a 727 is NEVER flown DR. knock it off.


You would know.











JAXAshby August 7th 04 03:32 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
shen, stay out of this discussion. the basics are way beyond you. next, you
will be telling us *you* wondered around a rocky channel in a fog with just a
compass and a knotmeter and used your incredible skill to get very lucky and
not hit anything therefore you were not lucky at all.

same same arguement used by drunk drivers.

From: (Shen44)
Date: 7/21/2004 3:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id:

(JAXAshby)
Date: 07/21/2004 05:38 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

shen, Denver to Mpls non-stop at night is not a daysail.


Interesting. So, you've navigated a plane, once, as the person in charge of
navigation, over land.... not the most experienced at this, are you.
In truth, I wasn't interested in some aircraft navigation. Although the
basics
are the same there are a number of differences in the details and dem details
can get you "dead".
Next question. How many known channels have you navigated in fog?

Shen









Harry Krause August 7th 04 04:26 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
JAXAshby wrote:

shen, stay out of this discussion.


Discussion? With you? Please. You're an unreconstructed, know-nothing
asshole with a crappy little sailboat that should have been taken to the
dumpster years ago.




--
"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me -
you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept.
17, 2002

Shen44 August 7th 04 06:47 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
Subject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation
From: (JAXAshby)

shen, stay out of this discussion. the basics are way beyond you. next, you
will be telling us *you* wondered around a rocky channel in a fog with just a
compass and a knotmeter and used your incredible skill to get very lucky and
not hit anything therefore you were not lucky at all.

same same arguement used by drunk drivers.


Been trying to come up with an intelligent response for quite a bit of time, I
see.
Maybe you should have thought some more, cause ya didn't make it.
Read all the manuals, books, etc., you want jaxass, but until you get out there
and actually use that stuff, all you'll be is someone who can quote
definitions.
Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog.
However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass, tach,
and watch, with no problems .... does that count?

Shen

JAXAshby August 7th 04 06:57 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog.
However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass,
tach,
and watch, with no problems .... does that count?

Shen


only in the stew ped department, shen. only in the stew ped dept.

you dumb squat, you have no idea how lucky you were. like the drunk driver who
made it home through traffic.


Shen44 August 7th 04 07:49 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
ubject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation
From: "Gene Kearns"
Date: 08/07/2004 11:22 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

On 21 Jul 2004 19:06:10 GMT,
(Shen44) wrote:

(JAXAshby)
Date: 07/21/2004 05:38 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

shen, Denver to Mpls non-stop at night is not a daysail.


Interesting. So, you've navigated a plane, once, as the person in charge of
navigation, over land.... not the most experienced at this, are you.
In truth, I wasn't interested in some aircraft navigation. Although the

basics
are the same there are a number of differences in the details and dem

details
can get you "dead".
Next question. How many known channels have you navigated in fog?

Shen


If you get an answer to that one, I kinda like to know how many channels he
has
navigated in a known fog??


As passenger or navigator?

As navigator, none. He hasn't the skills needed.

Shen

bomar August 7th 04 07:54 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

shen, stay out of this discussion.


Discussion? With you? Please. You're an unreconstructed, know-nothing
asshole with a crappy little sailboat that should have been taken to the
dumpster years ago.



As opposed to Harry, who is a know it all boatless old child molester that
will be sleeping in a dumpster shortly....



Shen44 August 7th 04 11:45 PM

Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
 
ubject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 08/07/2004 10:57 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog.
However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass,
tach,
and watch, with no problems .... does that count?

Shen


only in the stew ped department, shen. only in the stew ped dept.

you dumb squat, you have no idea how lucky you were. like the drunk driver
who
made it home through traffic.


Only an idiot would discount luck, totally, but there's a difference between
relying on luck alone and using ALL the information available to get the job
done.
Since you are a product of GPS, I would not expect you to understand how this
could be done regularly with less danger than allowing YOU to run the same
channel WITH a GPS on a clear day.

Shen


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com