![]() |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Thanks for taking your time to share this information. Though I am not a world sailor, this is quite interesting. I never knew there was a difference in terminology regarding dead reckoning. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. As I said, I am not a world sailor. I rely on GPS and an accurate compass to take me home. But then again, I am not more than 25 miles or so off shore. However, I have heard the term used and assumed wrongly that it meant exact knowledge of position. My hobby happens to be history and the old letters and books I have read refer to dead reckoning of a position or course. This thread is quite enlightening giving me a better understanding of the intended words. Thanks to all |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
I worked for two
semesters as an editor and project director of the National Union Catalog, a project that involved alphabetizing and organizing the entire card catalogue of the Library of Congress. yup, THAT proves "dead bang on center" means horribly inaccurate. way to go, hoary. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
hoary, the Port Jeff stacks haven't puffed in nearly three decades.
oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. Give it up, Jax. You've got a ****ty little clapped out daysailer, and probably couldn't navigate from Milford to Port Jefferson on a bright sunny day with the Port Jeff stacks puffing. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
As I said, I am not a world sailor. I rely on GPS and an accurate compass to
take me home. enjoy, john. and don't worry about it, for in today's world there is no reason not to have a gps or two onboard if there is any remote chance of needing it. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... As I said, I am not a world sailor. I rely on GPS and an accurate compass to take me home. enjoy, john. and don't worry about it, for in today's world there is no reason not to have a gps or two onboard if there is any remote chance of needing it. Thanks for the thread JAX. I am enjoying this one. Amazing what one can learn! Regards |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JAXAshby wrote:
hoary, the Port Jeff stacks haven't puffed in nearly three decades. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. Give it up, Jax. You've got a ****ty little clapped out daysailer, and probably couldn't navigate from Milford to Port Jefferson on a bright sunny day with the Port Jeff stacks puffing. Well, that's good to know. It's been a while since I spent the summer at Woodmont, CT. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
hoary, it has been a while since you did anything but bitch and whine.
hoary, the Port Jeff stacks haven't puffed in nearly three decades. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. Give it up, Jax. You've got a ****ty little clapped out daysailer, and probably couldn't navigate from Milford to Port Jefferson on a bright sunny day with the Port Jeff stacks puffing. Well, that's good to know. It's been a while since I spent the summer at Woodmont, CT. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:20:49 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Nice try, dipstick, but the sources I quoted are quite real, unlike the imaginary gremlins that occupy your synapses. Ded or Dead is proper. If you want to compare your education in and experience with etymology to mine, why, you go right ahead. My master's degree in English is really in etymology, and, as part of the requirements, I worked for two semesters as an editor and project director of the National Union Catalog, a project that involved alphabetizing and organizing the entire card catalogue of the Library of Congress. The definition I posted is from the second edition of the OED. There's no knowledge you have that trumps the OED. And, has your wife completed her second doctorate yet? Are there really people who still believe this stuff from you, Harry? John H No, she hasn't. But, then, I never stated she did. Are you still taking sexually oriented photos of minors, John? |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
And, has your wife completed her second doctorate yet? Are there really
people who still believe this stuff from you, Harry? John H if hoary knew what the OED is, he would know it is a historical document, not an arbitrator. |
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JAXAshby wrote:
And, has your wife completed her second doctorate yet? Are there really people who still believe this stuff from you, Harry? John H if hoary knew what the OED is, he would know it is a historical document, not an arbitrator. Most dictionaries are historial documents, ****-for-brains. The OED is quite live, with a usually annual update, and, in fact, a completely new third edition is in the works. I own two complete OEDs, plus the OED on CD. Version 4.0 of the OED on CD is scheduled for release sometime this fall. For about $700, you can buy a complete hardbound set of the current OED, and for about $200 to $250, the same data on CD. Or you can subscribe. The latter is a good bet, because it includes the updates as they are produced. I don't think you want to play word games with me, Mr. Speedo. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com