basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
Harry Krause wrote:

My Republican father-in-law

Which one?

-- Charlie

Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law
legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know.

Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our
b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him.

-- Charlie

Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have
more than one father in law? YOU said it...

You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they
already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed.

Ready?

A mormon married to 9 women.

Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does
that man have?

A) 9
B) 9
C) 9
D) 9

-- Charlie

You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United
States.

I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake
using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid
is as stupid does.


Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb?

Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I
understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep
breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise
from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you
than they already do.

To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a
big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal
vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other
hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do
not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana
plants doing?)

Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your
long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark
plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies.

Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what
you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie...

-- Charlie

Don White wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...

Ready?

A mormon married to 9 women.

Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does
that man have?

A) 9
B) 9
C) 9
D) 9

-- Charlie

** Not so fast Charlie...what if the mormon married two, three or four
sisters. How many fathers-in-law then?

I thought the answer would be obvious to you Don, but I'll slow down for you.

If the the sisters were all step-sisters, and not all legally adopted by
one man, then the answer would be 2, 3, or 4.

-- Charlie

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
Harry Krause wrote:

My Republican father-in-law

Which one?

-- Charlie

Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law
legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know.

Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our
b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him.

-- Charlie

Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have
more than one father in law? YOU said it...

You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they
already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed.

Ready?

A mormon married to 9 women.

Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does
that man have?

A) 9
B) 9
C) 9
D) 9

-- Charlie

You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United
States.

I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake
using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid
is as stupid does.


Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb?

Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I
understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep
breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise
from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you
than they already do.

To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a
big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal
vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other
hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do
not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana
plants doing?)

You said "bigamist". That is a person who is married more than once,
at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above
blather?

Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your
long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark
plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies.

Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what
you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie...

-- Charlie

God, you are stupid.

"basskisser" wrote in message
m...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
Choice "E"...all of the above.


A little common sense would serve you well, NOYB. You DO realize that
bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that
I stated originally, that bigamy is illegal in the United States,
don't you? You do realize that you are now accusing someone of being a
bigamist, don't you?

I accused you of being stupid, not a bigamist. If you *were* a
bigamist--and I never claimed that you were--then you'd be a stupid
bigamist. Since you claim not to be a bigamist, then you're just plain ol'
stupid.

basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
Harry Krause wrote:

My Republican father-in-law

Which one?

-- Charlie

Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law
legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know.

Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our
b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him.

-- Charlie

Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have
more than one father in law? YOU said it...

You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they
already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed.

Ready?

A mormon married to 9 women.

Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does
that man have?

A) 9
B) 9
C) 9
D) 9

-- Charlie

You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United
States.

I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake
using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid
is as stupid does.


Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb?

Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I
understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep
breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise
from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you
than they already do.

To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a
big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal
vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other
hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do
not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana
plants doing?)

You said "bigamist".

No, I never said bigamist, you said bigamist. I said 'big-a-mist'.

Take that knot out of the thing you call your brain, dunce.



That is a person who is married more than once,
at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above
blather?

Now I'm confused. Are you saying that krause is a bigamist or a big-a-mist?



Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your
long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark
plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies.

Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what
you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie...

-- Charlie

God, you are stupid.

Just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean God is stupid.

-- Charlie

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
Harry Krause wrote:

My Republican father-in-law

Which one?

-- Charlie

Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law
legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know.

Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our
b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him.

-- Charlie

Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have
more than one father in law? YOU said it...

You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they
already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed.

Ready?

A mormon married to 9 women.

Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does
that man have?

A) 9
B) 9
C) 9
D) 9

-- Charlie

You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United
States.

I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake
using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid
is as stupid does.


Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb?

Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I
understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep
breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise
from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you
than they already do.

To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a
big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal
vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other
hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do
not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana
plants doing?)

You said "bigamist".

No, I never said bigamist, you said bigamist. I said 'big-a-mist'.

Take that knot out of the thing you call your brain, dunce.



That is a person who is married more than once,
at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above
blather?

Now I'm confused. Are you saying that krause is a bigamist or a big-a-mist?

If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it
was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist.



Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your
long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark
plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies.

Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what
you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie...

-- Charlie

God, you are stupid.

Just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean God is stupid.

-- Charlie

Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? How can Harry
have more than one father in law? Bigamy is illegal in the United
States. Are you saying that he is commiting a crime?

basskisser wrote:

If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it
was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist.

Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist.

Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote
and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant.
Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks
will come to your defence again.


Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we?

The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit
smoking the weed there, boy.

-- Charlie

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it
was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist.

Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist.

Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote
and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant.
Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks
will come to your defence again.


Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we?

The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit
smoking the weed there, boy.

-- Charlie

Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed. Do you have any?

basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it
was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist.

Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist.

Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote
and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant.
Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks
will come to your defence again.


Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we?

The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit
smoking the weed there, boy.

-- Charlie

Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed.

You demonstrate the effect of it daily.


Do you have any?

Pot? Nope. Why, do you need more?

-- Charlie

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it
was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist.

Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist.

Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote
and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant.
Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks
will come to your defence again.


Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we?

The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit
smoking the weed there, boy.

-- Charlie

Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed.

You demonstrate the effect of it daily.


Do you have any?

Pot? Nope. Why, do you need more?

-- Charlie

Ah, I see that, because you can't put any fact with your wild,
unfounded allegations, that you've stooped even lower by snipping my
words. Quit being such a baby. That's a little kid's trick.