Liberal Racist?
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:42:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

I'd be curious as to see the precise details of each and every bill
that this president has signed, versus the previous president, and
compare to those vetoed and the reasons given.


Liar. You're not curious at all. If you were, you'd simply call your
senator's office and ask for the information you mentioned above.
You'd
get
it, and easily.

Dealing with political offices is an exercise in frustration.

It's probably easier to search on the web. Point being that there is
little factual information here and lots of speculation.

Dave


Weenie. You keep closing doors. YOU said "I'd be curious...". It's easy
to
find out how presidents voted on legislation. You're either too lazy, or
you
really don't want the answer to your question. Someone here would almost
certainly ask you to post a link, and the information might let the air
out
of your argument.

Or if they were so inclined as to actually PROVE me wrong, THEY could
post the link.

In any case, I have already gotten one answer, and if you believe the
link that Chuck provided, then Bush HAS vetoed at least one spending
bill.....

Dave


Doesn't matter to me. I was simply reminding you that you're the guy who
recently came up with a bunch of excuses for not getting involved in town
politics, and that this suggests the unlikelihood of your taking any
intitiative to find out how your president or representatives vote.

Liberal Racist?
 

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:42:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

I'd be curious as to see the precise details of each and every bill
that this president has signed, versus the previous president, and
compare to those vetoed and the reasons given.


Liar. You're not curious at all. If you were, you'd simply call your
senator's office and ask for the information you mentioned above.
You'd
get
it, and easily.

Dealing with political offices is an exercise in frustration.

It's probably easier to search on the web. Point being that there is
little factual information here and lots of speculation.

Dave


Weenie. You keep closing doors. YOU said "I'd be curious...". It's easy
to
find out how presidents voted on legislation. You're either too lazy, or
you
really don't want the answer to your question. Someone here would almost
certainly ask you to post a link, and the information might let the air
out
of your argument.

Or if they were so inclined as to actually PROVE me wrong, THEY could
post the link.

In any case, I have already gotten one answer, and if you believe the
link that Chuck provided, then Bush HAS vetoed at least one spending
bill.....

Dave


Doesn't matter to me. I was simply reminding you that you're the guy who
recently came up with a bunch of excuses for not getting involved in town
politics, and that this suggests the unlikelihood of your taking any
intitiative to find out how your president or representatives vote.



Worse, he doesn't read books, either. And he doesn't mind if 10,000 dogs
crap on his lawn.

Liberal Racist?
 

Harry Krause wrote:

And he doesn't mind if 10,000 dogs crap on his lawn.

Did you hear about those rouge American vigilantes in Afghanistan that
were running their own justice system and prison out of a rented house?

I immediately thought of kanter.

I wonder if they included dogs, cats, and children.

-- Charlie

Liberal Racist?
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Harry Krause wrote:

And he doesn't mind if 10,000 dogs crap on his lawn.

Did you hear about those rouge American vigilantes in Afghanistan that
were running their own justice system and prison out of a rented house?

I immediately thought of kanter.

I wonder if they included dogs, cats, and children.

-- Charlie

"rouge" ????? Red?

Liberal Racist?
 

Doug Kanter wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Harry Krause wrote:

And he doesn't mind if 10,000 dogs crap on his lawn.

Did you hear about those rouge American vigilantes in Afghanistan that
were running their own justice system and prison out of a rented house?

I immediately thought of kanter.

I wonder if they included dogs, cats, and children.

-- Charlie

"rouge" ????? Red?

No, rogue, an individual exhibiting a chance and usually inferior
biological variation.

-- Charlie

Liberal Racist?
 

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:45:21 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:42:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

I'd be curious as to see the precise details of each and every bill
that this president has signed, versus the previous president, and
compare to those vetoed and the reasons given.


Liar. You're not curious at all. If you were, you'd simply call your
senator's office and ask for the information you mentioned above.
You'd
get
it, and easily.

Dealing with political offices is an exercise in frustration.

It's probably easier to search on the web. Point being that there is
little factual information here and lots of speculation.

Dave


Weenie. You keep closing doors. YOU said "I'd be curious...". It's easy
to
find out how presidents voted on legislation. You're either too lazy, or
you
really don't want the answer to your question. Someone here would almost
certainly ask you to post a link, and the information might let the air
out
of your argument.

Or if they were so inclined as to actually PROVE me wrong, THEY could
post the link.

In any case, I have already gotten one answer, and if you believe the
link that Chuck provided, then Bush HAS vetoed at least one spending
bill.....

Dave


Doesn't matter to me. I was simply reminding you that you're the guy who
recently came up with a bunch of excuses for not getting involved in town
politics,

Which was based on personal experience. When you hit yourself on the
head with a brick, and you find out that it hurts, do you do it again?


and that this suggests the unlikelihood of your taking any
intitiative to find out how your president or representatives vote.

You have absolutely NO idea of just what I am currently involved with
politically. To give you a hint, I was invited to attend the
republican convention, but I declined because I just don't have that
kind of money to throw around.

Dave

Liberal Racist?
 

On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:48:27 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:42:15 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:02:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

I'd be curious as to see the precise details of each and every bill
that this president has signed, versus the previous president, and
compare to those vetoed and the reasons given.


Liar. You're not curious at all. If you were, you'd simply call your
senator's office and ask for the information you mentioned above.
You'd
get
it, and easily.

Dealing with political offices is an exercise in frustration.

It's probably easier to search on the web. Point being that there is
little factual information here and lots of speculation.

Dave


Weenie. You keep closing doors. YOU said "I'd be curious...". It's easy
to
find out how presidents voted on legislation. You're either too lazy, or
you
really don't want the answer to your question. Someone here would almost
certainly ask you to post a link, and the information might let the air
out
of your argument.

Or if they were so inclined as to actually PROVE me wrong, THEY could
post the link.

In any case, I have already gotten one answer, and if you believe the
link that Chuck provided, then Bush HAS vetoed at least one spending
bill.....

Dave


Doesn't matter to me. I was simply reminding you that you're the guy who
recently came up with a bunch of excuses for not getting involved in town
politics, and that this suggests the unlikelihood of your taking any
intitiative to find out how your president or representatives vote.



Worse, he doesn't read books, either. And he doesn't mind if 10,000 dogs
crap on his lawn.

I wouldn't read your book, assuming you could write one. My time is
precious. I don't waste it reading untruths. I do read books, but
mostly non-fiction, and technical publications.

At least I don't take the position that I have a right to "shoot on
sight" any dog who might inadvertently crap on my lawn.

Dave

Liberal Racist?
 

Dave Hall wrote:

I do read books, but
mostly non-fiction,


You don't seem to absorb much.

Liberal Racist?
 

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...

Doesn't matter to me. I was simply reminding you that you're the guy who
recently came up with a bunch of excuses for not getting involved in town
politics,

Which was based on personal experience. When you hit yourself on the
head with a brick, and you find out that it hurts, do you do it again?

Awwww....poor Dave. It was too difficult to get to your local politicians,
so you stepped out of the democratic process for good.

Sometimes, doing some sort of maintenance in your attic requires getting all
itchy from the fiberglass insulation. But you still do it.



and that this suggests the unlikelihood of your taking any
intitiative to find out how your president or representatives vote.

You have absolutely NO idea of just what I am currently involved with
politically. To give you a hint, I was invited to attend the
republican convention, but I declined because I just don't have that
kind of money to throw around.

Oooh. That must've been a really exclusive mailing list you were on, along
with 23 million other people.

Liberal Racist?
 

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 07:46:48 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

I do read books, but
mostly non-fiction,


You don't seem to absorb much.

I'm not the one trying to pass off emotionally charged rhetoric, and
pure speculation, as fact.

What good does knowing more do for you, when most of it is wrong?

Dave