Harry Krause wrote in message ...
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
If any ever requires a completely legitimate trial before being hanged,
it is Saddam Hussein. Yet Saddam wasn't represented by his lawyers at
the arraignment this morning. He was alone, facing the judge.

We can't seem to do anything right in Iraq, and yes, I know, the Iraqis
are now running things over there, even though they are not.

Saddam should have had his lawyers present. Period. If we are going to
try to convince the Moslem world and the rest of the world that we
really believe in what we preach, and these trials are legitimate and
"fair," then we have to abide by what we preach. It doesn't matter what
Saddam "deserves," in terms of the outcome. Process matters.

I loved the part where the judge wanted Saddam to sign papers and told
him he didn't need his lawyer present to do it. Saddam refused, as he
should have. You can't trust "the system" anywhere, even if you are a
monster like Saddam Hussein.


Iraqi Court. Iraqi Judge. Iraqi legal system. Understand now?

I figured you would find it in yourself to defend the guy.




I'm not defending Saddam, you ignorant ass. I'm defending the concept of
a trial through a legal process that will do us some good around the world.

Do you work extra hard at being stupid?

As for the Iraqi court, judge, legal system...that's convenient, eh? But
not particularly convincing. Especially when the US military did not
allow independent news microphones in the room. Is the entire trial to
be censored by the US, directly or indirectly?

,.You haven't a clue as to how Iraq has been restructured, at least
temporarily, by the United States.

Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything and anything that comes out of BushCo, or
you're a traitor.

"basskisser" wrote in message

Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything..... etc etc etc


Hey bass, check for polyps while you're up there!

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything..... etc etc etc


Hey bass, check for polyps while you're up there!


Nice, I'll have to remember that one.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message

Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything..... etc etc etc


Hey bass, check for polyps while you're up there!

Ignorant statement, from an ignorant little boy.

I take exception to that, BK... I have disagreed with a lot that has come
out of that white house, particularly on the domestic side.



"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Harry Krause wrote in message
...


Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything and anything that comes out of BushCo, or
you're a traitor.

"Megalodon" wrote in message
ink.net...
I take exception to that, BK... I have disagreed with a lot that has
come
out of that white house, particularly on the domestic side.



You are witnessing the liebral debate manual 101.....accuse your opponent
of what you are guilty of......comes right after "Blame America First"


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Harry Krause wrote in message
...


Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything and anything that comes out of BushCo, or
you're a traitor.

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

You are witnessing the liebral debate manual 101.....accuse your
opponent
of what you are guilty of......comes right after "Blame America First"

And your extreme is acceptable? Pretend that our foreign policies have
always been perfect, and that anyone who reacts negatively to them is nuts?

"Megalodon" wrote in message link.net...
I take exception to that, BK... I have disagreed with a lot that has come
out of that white house, particularly on the domestic side.

Then, according to MOST right wingers, you are a traitor for disagreeing.

That's an extreme interpretation.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Megalodon" wrote in message
link.net...
I take exception to that, BK... I have disagreed with a lot that has
come
out of that white house, particularly on the domestic side.

Then, according to MOST right wingers, you are a traitor for disagreeing.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Harry, those narrow minded right wingers can't think like that. You
are either with everything and anything that comes out of BushCo, or
you're a traitor.

Bass,
Harry thinks you are a dummy, he just doesn't say anything because you are a
democratic, but he is cringing everything you make a post. Follow JohnH's
suggestion and have Harry proof your posts before you make them.