|
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
mono sect wrote:
There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
jim-- wrote: So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. krause credible? That's an oxymoron. -- Charlie |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. I never stated anything about O'Reilly and whether I believe in what he says. I simply asked you to address points of the message he gave that are not true, something that you still cannot do. You then attack me and call me childish names for doing so. This is your typical MO when you are again caught in a corner. Laughable. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL Indeed, and perhaps someday you'll learn to think, write, and spell. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: I never stated anything about O'Reilly and whether I believe in what he says. I simply asked you to address points of the message he gave I am not interested in "addressing" messages that the sleaze known as O'Reilly gives. I've seen enough from the extreme right to know there is very little it produces that is worth the time it takes to read. When I want responsible opinion from the right, I know where to find it. It ain't on Faux or NewsMax or in this newsgroup. How many times do you have to be told that I have NO interest in engaging in ongoing debate with usenet neocon asswipes? 100 times? 200 times? Do your synapses ever connect? I have told you over and again that I have NO interest in engaging the likes of you in political discussions. In these forums, I simply enjoy watching right-wing trash like you and Gawkin and Bertie and a few others attempting to rationalize the never-ending lies and screw-ups of Bush et al. When I feel it will help matters move along, I'll toss in a brief response or two. When I want to engage in political badinage with a rightie here, I'll pick on Nobby. He's got tongue in his cheek and a great sense of humor. You, on the other hand, have your foot stuck in your mouth, and couldn't turn a decent phrase if your life depended upon it. Got it now? So exactly what is it that O'Reilly said that is not true? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL Indeed....he has yet to address the initial question. It is fun though making Krause twist and turn like a puppet. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Charles" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. krause credible? That's an oxymoron. -- Charlie Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
mono sect wrote:
"Charles" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. krause credible? That's an oxymoron. -- Charlie Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack Thank you: I appreciate it. Imagine...three right-wing buttwipers picking on me, and in very short order. It's working. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: "Charles" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. krause credible? That's an oxymoron. -- Charlie Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack Thank you: I appreciate it. Imagine...three right-wing buttwipers picking on me, and in very short order. It's working. You admit you're lying then? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Harry Krause wrote:
Harry Krause=troll/moron/asshole/loser/fukkhead |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Harry Krause wrote: Harry Krause=troll/moron/asshole/loser/fukkhead |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Harry Krause wrote:
Harry Krause=troll/moron/asshole/loser/fukkhead |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Harry Krause wrote: Harry Krause=troll/moron/asshole/loser/fukkhead |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
mono sect wrote:
"Nomen Nescio" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Harry Krause wrote: Harry Krause=troll/moron/asshole/loser/fukkhead Bet you are a Bush voter, right? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... When I want to engage in political badinage with a rightie here, I'll pick on Nobby. He's got tongue in his cheek and a great sense of humor. Actually, I don't. Very often my humor is sarcastic in nature...and we all know that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:14:40 -0400, "NOYB" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... When I want to engage in political badinage with a rightie here, I'll pick on Nobby. He's got tongue in his cheek and a great sense of humor. Actually, I don't. Very often my humor is sarcastic in nature...and we all know that sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. "Pick on??" Sounds like Harry and Doug are trying to occupy the same pedestal. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. That remark shows just how biased you are, and probably not as bright as you think you are. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. Ahhh.. name calling. The last bastion of the intellectually inferior. The final argument for the wiseguy without an arguement. "Neocon wanna-be"... Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what EXACTLY a neocon wanna-be really is? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
John Gaquin wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL Indeed, and perhaps someday you'll learn to think, write, and spell. Perhaps one day you will develope a real personality, and maybe get laid. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
|
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"basskisser" wrote in message Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is. So, then ....... who explained it all to you? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is. So, then ....... who explained it all to you? Ah, the village idiot pops up, as usual. Jeez, don't even need bait with you, just snag you out of the water. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
|
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
basskisser wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "basskisser" wrote in message Simple, really. I think that most people of average intelligence would be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is. So, then ....... who explained it all to you? Ah, the village idiot pops up, as usual. Jeez, don't even need bait with you, just snag you out of the water. Just a minute there, fella. There are lots of village idiots on the right here...I would be hard-pressed to select one as *the* village idiot! Gawkin is in the pack, though, no doubt about it. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Just a minute there, fella. LOL You guys run a marvelous MAS. keep it up -- it's all you've got left. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"basskisser" wrote in message Don't evade the issue -- answer the question. If it requires average intelligence to be able to figure out what a "neocon wanna-be" is, who explained it all to you? Harry? Hehehe |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION
of conservbative logic. 1. Make an assumption 2. Declare you own assumption "true" 2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous assumption. 3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in its promulgation. Thanks for sharing! Dave Hall wrote: So, judging from your definition, a "new" conservative is someone who used to be something else but is now conservative. Since the ideological opposite of conservative is liberal, then following that logic, the conclusion can be drawn that a "new" conservative is most likely an "old" liberal. A former liberal who now, after having to move out of their parent's house, getting a job of their own, starting a family, and realizing how the world really works, has now matured and come to the realization that liberal idealism is a joke, which tries to force equality where it can't exist naturally. Consequently, their viewpoint have changed to embrace what traditional conservative values are. So a "neo conservative" is a liberal convert. Seems to be a lot of those lately. Liberalism is having a tough time holding on to people over the age of 30. Unless, of course, they haven't yet achieved anything, and still look to the government for "help"...... Dave |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Gould 0738 wrote:
FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION of conservbative logic. 1. Make an assumption 2. Declare you own assumption "true" 2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous assumption. 3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in its promulgation. Thanks for sharing! Indeed, this is what I enjoy most about the "cons" here...and why I rarely bother to correct their "mis-assumptions." It's fun to watch them. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
|
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:42:25 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:
Gould 0738 wrote: FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION of conservbative logic. 1. Make an assumption 2. Declare you own assumption "true" 2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous assumption. 3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in its promulgation. Thanks for sharing! Indeed, this is what I enjoy most about the "cons" here...and why I rarely bother to correct their "mis-assumptions." It's fun to watch them. Saw a pretty sight when I went to Breezy Point to visit my buddy on the Linda J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
John H wrote:
a J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. I know where my boats are. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. What tempts you doesn't interest me. Tell me, John, do you post this kind of information in the hopes that one of the lesser brain output types here will engage in a bit of vandalism? Perhaps I should publish your home address, telephone number, license plate numbers (on your motorbike, too), and your SSN. Would you like that? The thing is, I wouldn't do that to you. But you would do it to me. And that's one of the big differences between us. I keep my disputes here here. You, on the other hand, are out to cause damage. You're a lowlife, John Herring. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H wrote: a J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. I know where my boats are. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. What tempts you doesn't interest me. Tell me, John, do you post this kind of information in the hopes that one of the lesser brain output types here will engage in a bit of vandalism? Perhaps I should publish your home address, telephone number, license plate numbers (on your motorbike, too), and your SSN. Would you like that? The thing is, I wouldn't do that to you. But you would do it to me. And that's one of the big differences between us. I keep my disputes here here. You, on the other hand, are out to cause damage. You're a lowlife, John Herring. Basskisser, where are you when you are needed? Talk about wild assumptions....Krause is making some doozies. Krause, you are one hell of a paranoid screwed up human. I truly hope you get help....and soon. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H wrote: a J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. I know where my boats are. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. What tempts you doesn't interest me. Tell me, John, do you post this kind of information in the hopes that one of the lesser brain output types here will engage in a bit of vandalism? Perhaps I should publish your home address, telephone number, license plate numbers (on your motorbike, too), and your SSN. Would you like that? The thing is, I wouldn't do that to you. But you would do it to me. And that's one of the big differences between us. I keep my disputes here here. You, on the other hand, are out to cause damage. You're a lowlife, John Herring. Basskisser, where are you when you are needed? Talk about wild assumptions....Krause is making some doozies. Krause, you are one hell of a paranoid screwed up human. I truly hope you get help....and soon. How's your wife, Dennis? |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H wrote: a J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. I know where my boats are. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. What tempts you doesn't interest me. Tell me, John, do you post this kind of information in the hopes that one of the lesser brain output types here will engage in a bit of vandalism? Perhaps I should publish your home address, telephone number, license plate numbers (on your motorbike, too), and your SSN. Would you like that? The thing is, I wouldn't do that to you. But you would do it to me. And that's one of the big differences between us. I keep my disputes here here. You, on the other hand, are out to cause damage. You're a lowlife, John Herring. Basskisser, where are you when you are needed? Talk about wild assumptions....Krause is making some doozies. Krause, you are one hell of a paranoid screwed up human. I truly hope you get help....and soon. How's your wife, Dennis? I rest my case. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
It is fun to watch you make insults to jim-- when he didn't take you up on
your bet, but it was even funnier to watch you crawl under your rock when he called your bluff on the lobster boat and Karen. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: FASCINATING DEMONSTRATION of conservbative logic. 1. Make an assumption 2. Declare you own assumption "true" 2. (a) Make additional assumptions that rely on the truth of the previous assumption. 3. Decide your newly discovered truth is holy writ and become self righteous in its promulgation. Thanks for sharing! Indeed, this is what I enjoy most about the "cons" here...and why I rarely bother to correct their "mis-assumptions." It's fun to watch them. |
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
How is Karen, has she forgiven you for being embarrassed about her being a
social worker? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H wrote: a J. Just inside the gate, on the right, on a trailer, was a Parker 2520XL named the "Yo Ho." Don't know if it's yours or not, but it looks much like it. I know where my boats are. Parked where it is, it's going to collect a lot of dust from the limestone and clay as people drive around there. I'd be tempted to put it further away from the main drag. What tempts you doesn't interest me. Tell me, John, do you post this kind of information in the hopes that one of the lesser brain output types here will engage in a bit of vandalism? Perhaps I should publish your home address, telephone number, license plate numbers (on your motorbike, too), and your SSN. Would you like that? The thing is, I wouldn't do that to you. But you would do it to me. And that's one of the big differences between us. I keep my disputes here here. You, on the other hand, are out to cause damage. You're a lowlife, John Herring. Basskisser, where are you when you are needed? Talk about wild assumptions....Krause is making some doozies. Krause, you are one hell of a paranoid screwed up human. I truly hope you get help....and soon. How's your wife, Dennis? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com