Which dictionary is the one we should all rely on for accuracy?
John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

There is no one dictionary that is always correct.

Binary neocon thinking: A given dictionary will always be right or wrong.

Somebody or some thing will have all the unquestionable answers, so the only
challenge is to pick the right somebody or something.

On 24 Jun 2004 14:27:12 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Which dictionary is the one we should all rely on for accuracy?
John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

There is no one dictionary that is always correct.

Binary neocon thinking: A given dictionary will always be right or wrong.

Somebody or some thing will have all the unquestionable answers, so the only
challenge is to pick the right somebody or something.

But the M-W is definitely wrong in this case, true? How does one determine which
is the right source? Do you just search until you find a source that supports
your position?

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

John H wrote:
On 24 Jun 2004 14:27:12 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Which dictionary is the one we should all rely on for accuracy?
John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

There is no one dictionary that is always correct.

Binary neocon thinking: A given dictionary will always be right or wrong.

Somebody or some thing will have all the unquestionable answers, so the only
challenge is to pick the right somebody or something.

But the M-W is definitely wrong in this case, true? How does one determine which
is the right source? Do you just search until you find a source that supports
your position?

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:41:56 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.


As opposed to you, a rigid mindless fool who accepts virtually every
line of bull**** the liberals and emotionally driven writer hacks feed
you?

Harry, the real joke is that you are nothing more than the flip side
of the same coin. If there is such a thing as a "neo-conservative"
(other than the webster definition), then you are a shining example of
a "neo-liberal".

Dave

Dave Hall wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:41:56 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.


As opposed to you, a rigid mindless fool who accepts virtually every
line of bull**** the liberals and emotionally driven writer hacks feed
you?


That's simply not true, Dave. I have different opinions on a number of
significant issues with the presumed Democratic standard=bearer and with
the true liberals in my party. As for the emotionally driven "writer
hacks," I suspect you are just jealous, as your writing skills are
rudimentary.




Harry, the real joke is that you are nothing more than the flip side
of the same coin. If there is such a thing as a "neo-conservative"
(other than the webster definition), then you are a shining example of
a "neo-liberal".

I'm more of a Clinton Democrat on fiscal issues, but very liberal on
social issues. I suspect my truly liberal friends would make you quake
in your boots.

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:42:10 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:41:56 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.


As opposed to you, a rigid mindless fool who accepts virtually every
line of bull**** the liberals and emotionally driven writer hacks feed
you?


That's simply not true, Dave. I have different opinions on a number of
significant issues with the presumed Democratic standard=bearer and with
the true liberals in my party.

Anyone can say that. No one is 100% in lock step with anyone's
political party.

As for the emotionally driven "writer
hacks," I suspect you are just jealous, as your writing skills are
rudimentary.

I am hardly "jealous". I at least have the integrity to report facts,
not my opinion of what my interpretation of those facts are. Most of
those articles, that you faithfully cut and paste, are little more
than op-ed pieces, with little factual basis. Sort of like Michael
Moore's "propagandamentary" film.


Harry, the real joke is that you are nothing more than the flip side
of the same coin. If there is such a thing as a "neo-conservative"
(other than the webster definition), then you are a shining example of
a "neo-liberal".

I'm more of a Clinton Democrat on fiscal issues, but very liberal on
social issues. I suspect my truly liberal friends would make you quake
in your boots.

I'm more of a Reagan conservative, but that's not the point.

Once I cut your liberal friends to shreds with solid reasoning and
practical logic, they would be the one's quaking. I wonder how many of
them truly understand the concepts of a free market economy and
freedom, and the benefits and consequences of each.


Dave

Dave Hall wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:42:10 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:41:56 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Am I a neocon because I looked in a M-W dictionary?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.


As opposed to you, a rigid mindless fool who accepts virtually every
line of bull**** the liberals and emotionally driven writer hacks feed
you?


That's simply not true, Dave. I have different opinions on a number of
significant issues with the presumed Democratic standard=bearer and with
the true liberals in my party.

Anyone can say that. No one is 100% in lock step with anyone's
political party.

As for the emotionally driven "writer
hacks," I suspect you are just jealous, as your writing skills are
rudimentary.

I am hardly "jealous". I at least have the integrity to report facts,


Dave, you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass. Your
simple-minded, right-wing pronouncements from "on the mount"
are the epitome of silliness. You're like a junkyard dog whose been
tossed a tired out old bone, and you're going to worry that meatless
bone down to what you hope is marrow. Except the bone is so old and
chewed out, there isn't any.

This is a boat newsgroup. Plonk.

Harry Krause wrote:

No, you are a neocon because you are a rigid, mindless fool who accepts
virtually every line of bull**** the neocons feed you.

As opposed to the bull**** you constantly feed us?

-- Charlie

This is a boat newsgroup. Plonk.