jim-- wrote:

So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be
credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message.

krause credible? That's an oxymoron.

-- Charlie

"Charles" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:

So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be
credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message.

krause credible? That's an oxymoron.

-- Charlie

Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack

mono sect wrote:
"Charles" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:

So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be
credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message.

krause credible? That's an oxymoron.

-- Charlie

Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack



Thank you: I appreciate it.
Imagine...three right-wing buttwipers picking on me, and in very short
order. It's working.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
mono sect wrote:
"Charles" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:

So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to
be
credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message.

krause credible? That's an oxymoron.

-- Charlie

Krause 'is' a Liberal lying sack



Thank you: I appreciate it.
Imagine...three right-wing buttwipers picking on me, and in very short
order. It's working.

You admit you're lying then?