"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

I never stated anything about O'Reilly and whether I believe in what he
says. I simply asked you to address points of the message he gave


I am not interested in "addressing" messages that the sleaze known as
O'Reilly gives. I've seen enough from the extreme right to know there is
very little it produces that is worth the time it takes to read. When I
want responsible opinion from the right, I know where to find it. It
ain't on Faux or NewsMax or in this newsgroup.

How many times do you have to be told that I have NO interest in
engaging in ongoing debate with usenet neocon asswipes? 100 times? 200
times? Do your synapses ever connect? I have told you over and again
that I have NO interest in engaging the likes of you in political
discussions. In these forums, I simply enjoy watching right-wing trash
like you and Gawkin and Bertie and a few others attempting to
rationalize the never-ending lies and screw-ups of Bush et al. When I
feel it will help matters move along, I'll toss in a brief response or
two.

When I want to engage in political badinage with a rightie here, I'll
pick on Nobby. He's got tongue in his cheek and a great sense of humor.
You, on the other hand, have your foot stuck in your mouth, and couldn't
turn a decent phrase if your life depended upon it.

Got it now?

So exactly what is it that O'Reilly said that is not true?