Doug Kanter wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...


In article .net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the

18-29


year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the

ages

of 18


to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors

and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like

me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK.

Got

it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of

baking

powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing

next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different

one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a
state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least,
know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...


In article .net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the

18-29


year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the

ages

of 18


to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors

and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending
our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like

me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed
President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK.

Got

it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of

baking

powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing

next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different

one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from
your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted
by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare
for a
state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very
least,
know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably
has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

"jim--" wrote in message
...


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably
has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.



Does Bush sound educated enough, IN YOUR OPINION, to be a brain surgeon?

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...


In article .net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that
the

18-29


year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the

ages

of 18


to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War
II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors

and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending
our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like

me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed
President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.
OK.

Got

it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of

baking

powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing

next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different

one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand
from
your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted
by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with
Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare
for a
state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very
least,
know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably
has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip
to Moscow at the same time

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...


In article
.net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that
the

18-29


year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the
answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between
the

ages

of 18


to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War
II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors

and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when
sending
our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy
like

me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed
President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.
OK.

Got

it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out
of

baking

powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing

next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different

one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the
various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations
of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand
from
your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as
quoted
by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with
Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to
prepare
for a
state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very
least,
know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and
laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton
probably
has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip
to Moscow at the same time





Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)

jim-- wrote:

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jps" wrote in message
t.com...



In article

.net,

says...



Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that

the

18-29



year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the

ages


of 18



to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War

II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors


and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending

our

kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like

me."


So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.

OK.

Got


it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of

baking


powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing


next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different


one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various

countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,

say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from

your

foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted

by

Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez

Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare

for a

state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,

know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.

Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably

has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip
to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jps" wrote in message
t.com...



In article

.net,

says...



Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that

the

18-29



year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the

ages


of 18



to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War

II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors


and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending

our

kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like

me."


So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.

OK.

Got


it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of

baking


powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing


next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different


one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various

countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,

say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from

your

foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted

by

Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez

Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare

for a

state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,

know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.

Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably

has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest
trip
to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.

And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.

jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jim--" wrote in message
.. .



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jps" wrote in message
net.com...




In article

ink.net,


says...




Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that

the


18-29




year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer


"why":



"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the


ages



of 18




to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War

II."


Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors



and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending


our


kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like


me."



So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?


Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.

OK.


Got



it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of


baking



powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing



next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different



one.



Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various


countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,


say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from


your


foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted


by


Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez


Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare


for a


state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,


know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably


has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest

trip

to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of
smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school.
Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual
accomplishment. No original research is needed.

Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it.
It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he
isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's
certainly in the top two.

jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:
snip
Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.

Bush got into Yale as a "legacy admission": his daddy
went there. It was a form of affirmative action.

Not sure how he managed to get a Harvard MBA, but I
suspect some of Bush I's money had a lot to do with it.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jps" wrote in message
t.com...



In article

.net,

says...



Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that

the

18-29



year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the

ages


of 18



to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War

II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors


and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending

our

kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like

me."


So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.

OK.

Got


it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of

baking


powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing


next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different


one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various

countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,

say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from

your

foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted

by

Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez

Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare

for a

state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,

know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.

Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably

has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest
trip
to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.

And what has being a Rhodes Scholar got to do with being a leader?