OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
P.Fritz wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...



"jim--" wrote in message
...



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jim--" wrote in message
. ..




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...




Doug Kanter wrote:





"jps" wrote in message
news:MPG.1b2e31f1ecabf3259898ea@news. seanet.com...





In article

thlink.net,



says...





Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which
showed

that

the



18-29





year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found
the

answer



"why":




"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans

between

the



ages




of 18





to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during
World

War

II."



Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high

school

seniors




and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending



our



kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological

whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular

guy

like



me."




So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an
uniformed

President?



Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in

WWII.

OK.



Got




it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I
ran

out

of



baking




powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who,

while

standing




next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from
a

different




one.




Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of
the

various



countries removed, and asked if he could point out the

locations

of,



say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned

first-hand

from



your



foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist
as

quoted



by



Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was

with

Janez



Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare



for a



state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the

very

least,



know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least
traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere

outside

the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk
and

laid.



Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably



has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back
when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war

protest

trip


to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have
been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections

So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of
connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his
local
draft board, and a US senator.


And lying his ass off to get the scholarship....based on the criteria

Mr. Rhodes' Will contains four criteria by which prospective Rhodes
Scholars
are to be selected:



1.. literary and scholastic attainments;


2.. energy to use one's talents to the full, as exemplified by
fondness
for and success in sports;


3.. truth, courage, devotion to duty, sympathy for and protection
of
the
weak, kindliness, unselfishness and fellowship;


4.. moral force of character and instincts to lead, and to take an
interest in one's fellow beings.

The Rhodes is more about being P.C than actual scholarship




Seems as if yo uwould not qualify on any of those conditions enumerated,
eh?


What a good argument Harry.


What do you expect from a bitter old man that has spend is life living off
of other's earnings?

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:
Rhodes Scholars did not qualify for deferment through 2-S status when
Clinton attended Oxford.
He should have been 1-A.

So should Dick Cheney.


Agreed, but jps stated that Cheney avoided service through "far more dubious
means". That's bull****.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford?

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM

Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford?

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM

Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger.

Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he
wasn't a draft dodger.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford?

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM

Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger.

Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he
wasn't a draft dodger.

Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970. It
was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest
knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at
least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing
was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD
toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country?

Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long?

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

jps wrote:
In article .net,
says...

Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29
year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18
to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.


The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors
and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Don't forget DURING the 2000 campaign, Bush once
referred to the inhabitants of Greece as the "Grecians".


Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me."

*Some* Republicans.

Republicans appeal to a lot of uneducated, dumb yokels.
Democrats appeal to a lot of misguided educated
people with lots of credentials and no common sense.
That's in addition to promising the moon and stars to
allegedly "disadvantaged" people.

Both parties stink.


So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President?

Duh.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at
Oxford?

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM

Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger.

Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean
he
wasn't a draft dodger.

Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970.
It
was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest
knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at
least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing
was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD
toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country?

Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long?



Wow! And I thought you guys would rise to the bait by blasting me for the
suggestion that Clinton was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford. Instead,
you bite...but in a totally different way. "He was serving his country by
working for the CIA". I was suggesting it tongue-in-cheek...and you guys
are serious!?!? LOL.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"****tard" wrote in message
ink.net...
jps wrote:
In article .net,
says...

Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the
18-29
year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages
of 18
to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.


The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors
and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Don't forget DURING the 2000 campaign, Bush once
referred to the inhabitants of Greece as the "Grecians".


grecian

\Gre"cian\, n. 1. A native or naturalized inhabitant of Greece; a Greek.



What's your point?

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

NOYB wrote:
"****tard" wrote in message
ink.net...

jps wrote:

In article .net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the

18-29

year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages

of 18

to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.


The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors
and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Don't forget DURING the 2000 campaign, Bush once
referred to the inhabitants of Greece as the "Grecians".



grecian

\Gre"cian\, n. 1. A native or naturalized inhabitant of Greece; a Greek.



What's your point?

I don't know what bonehead, post-2000, hillbilly
dictionary you found that in, but the modern
inhabitants of Greece are referred to, in English as
Greeks. ONLY as Greeks. Period. Full stop. The end.

'Grecian' is ONLY an adjective, never a noun.

Got it, possum-****er?

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean
he
wasn't a draft dodger.

Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970.
It
was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was
honest
knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited
at
least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole
thing
was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD
toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country?

Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long?



Wow! And I thought you guys would rise to the bait by blasting me for the
suggestion that Clinton was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford.
Instead,
you bite...but in a totally different way. "He was serving his country by
working for the CIA". I was suggesting it tongue-in-cheek...and you guys
are serious!?!? LOL.



The CIA does not recruit mindless idiots like your president. It comes as no
surprise that they went after Clinton. They need people who are able to
think outside the box.*

*The use of the word "box" is not an invitation to cheap humor.