OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

In article ,
says...

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip
to Moscow at the same time

Yes, as a Rhodes Scholar.

Not nearly as valuable as learning to fly an out of date jet for the
Texas Air National Guard.

Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and the rest of the
Chickenhawks all avoided service through far more dubious means.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jim--" wrote in message
.. .



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jps" wrote in message
net.com...




In article

ink.net,


says...




Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed
that

the


18-29




year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer


"why":



"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the


ages



of 18




to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World
War

II."


Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors



and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending


our


kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological
whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like


me."



So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?


Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in
WWII.

OK.


Got



it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of


baking



powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who,
while

standing



next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different



one.



Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various


countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,


say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from


your


foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted


by


Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez


Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare


for a


state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,


know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere
outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably


has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest

trip

to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of
smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school.
Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual
accomplishment. No original research is needed.

Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it.
It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he
isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's
certainly in the top two.

You are a joke.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...



"jim--" wrote in message
...



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jim--" wrote in message
.. .




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...




Doug Kanter wrote:





"jps" wrote in message
eanet.com...





In article

hlink.net,



says...





Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed

that

the



18-29





year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer



"why":




"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the



ages




of 18





to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World

War

II."



Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors




and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending



our



kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological

whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like



me."




So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?



Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in

WWII.

OK.



Got




it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of



baking




powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who,

while

standing




next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different




one.




Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various



countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,



say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from



your



foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted



by



Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez



Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare



for a



state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,



know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere

outside

the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.



Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably



has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest

trip


to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of
smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school.
Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual
accomplishment. No original research is needed.

Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it.
It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he
isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's
certainly in the top two.


You are a joke.



Perhaps, but the real joke is Bush.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

In article ,
says...

What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary. MY
15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to know
something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's wrong
with you, NOYB?

Using Republican doublespeak, Nobby's from the party of personal
responsibility, remember?

jps

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary.
MY
15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to
know
something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's
wrong
with you, NOYB?

Using Republican doublespeak, Nobby's from the party of personal
responsibility, remember?

jps

Right. I forgot. The foreign minister of Slovenia should've sent Bush some
sort of study guide about the country before he arrived for his visit.
"Europe for Dummies", or something like that.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net...
Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29
year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18
to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The poll says nothing of what percentage of those polled were either
Republican, or Democrat. Are you too stupid to understand ANYTHING?

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

Doug Kanter wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary.

MY

15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to

know

something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's

wrong

with you, NOYB?

Using Republican doublespeak, Nobby's from the party of personal
responsibility, remember?

jps


Right. I forgot. The foreign minister of Slovenia should've sent Bush some
sort of study guide about the country before he arrived for his visit.
"Europe for Dummies", or something like that.




He's just another of the Rationalizers for Bush. No matter how badly
Bush screws up, no matter what his lies, the RepubliBORG Rationalizers
have an excuse handy. They've convinced each other of his infallibility.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jim--" wrote in message
.. .



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jps" wrote in message
net.com...




In article

ink.net,


says...




Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed
that

the


18-29




year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer


"why":



"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the


ages



of 18




to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World
War

II."


Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors



and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending


our


kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological
whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like


me."



So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?


Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in
WWII.

OK.


Got



it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of


baking



powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who,
while

standing



next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different



one.



Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various


countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,


say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from


your


foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted


by


Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez


Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare


for a


state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,


know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere
outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably


has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest

trip

to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections

So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of
connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local
draft board, and a US senator.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

jim-- wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


jim-- wrote:



"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...



"jim--" wrote in message
...



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...



Doug Kanter wrote:




"jim--" wrote in message
.. .




"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...




Doug Kanter wrote:





"jps" wrote in message
eanet.com...





In article

hlink.net,



says...





Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed

that

the



18-29





year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer



"why":




"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the



ages




of 18





to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World

War

II."



Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors




and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending



our



kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological

whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like



me."




So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?



Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in

WWII.

OK.



Got




it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of



baking




powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who,

while

standing




next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different




one.




Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various



countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,



say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from



your



foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted



by



Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez



Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare



for a



state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,



know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere

outside

the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.



Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably



has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest

trip


to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.


And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.




So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections


So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of
connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local
draft board, and a US senator.





Clinton was selected as a Rhodes Scholar because of his smarts. Bush got
into Harvard Business School because of, mainly, his grandfather, and
then his father.

That's what was being discussed here. Brainpower. Clinton has it; Bush
does not.

OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
 

http://www.slovensko.com/slovakia.faq/edre/2