Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Star-bucks
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
That brings up the issue of who determines when the problem can't be
handled. As
the mayor, for arguments sake, has no assets, should the governor have the
decision?


Since we have decided Bush is responsible for everything that happens in the
world, I guess we should make him responsible for deciding when he thinks
local or state governments need help and he should override the Constitution
and local, state and national laws. Anytime a President thinks someone
needs help, he can suspend all laws and the constitution. We know this new
policy would never be abused. ; )


  #2   Report Post  
PocoLoco
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:21:46 -0400, "Star-bucks"
wrote:


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
.. .
That brings up the issue of who determines when the problem can't be
handled. As
the mayor, for arguments sake, has no assets, should the governor have the
decision?


Since we have decided Bush is responsible for everything that happens in the
world, I guess we should make him responsible for deciding when he thinks
local or state governments need help and he should override the Constitution
and local, state and national laws. Anytime a President thinks someone
needs help, he can suspend all laws and the constitution. We know this new
policy would never be abused. ; )

Perhaps not by Bush!

But really, who should have the power to say, "FEMA, it's all yours. Take over."
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
  #3   Report Post  
Starbuck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JohnH,

I believe it should be up to the local government to ask for state
assistance, and the state government should ask for federal assistance.

It appears that some in here believe it is up to FEMA to decide when they
should step in. If that happens, I can imagine FEMA stepping in a week
before landfall initially, then stepping in permentantly to make sure the
local and state governments are properly prepared. Heck why was resources
on local and state governments, when the FEDS can do it all.

--

Starbuck

Being weird isn't enough.


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:21:46 -0400, "Star-bucks"

wrote:


"PocoLoco" wrote in message
. ..
That brings up the issue of who determines when the problem can't be
handled. As
the mayor, for arguments sake, has no assets, should the governor have
the
decision?


Since we have decided Bush is responsible for everything that happens in
the
world, I guess we should make him responsible for deciding when he thinks
local or state governments need help and he should override the
Constitution
and local, state and national laws. Anytime a President thinks someone
needs help, he can suspend all laws and the constitution. We know this
new
policy would never be abused. ; )

Perhaps not by Bush!

But really, who should have the power to say, "FEMA, it's all yours. Take
over."
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



  #4   Report Post  
PocoLoco
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:29:30 -0400, "Starbuck"
wrote:

JohnH,

I believe it should be up to the local government to ask for state
assistance, and the state government should ask for federal assistance.

It appears that some in here believe it is up to FEMA to decide when they
should step in. If that happens, I can imagine FEMA stepping in a week
before landfall initially, then stepping in permentantly to make sure the
local and state governments are properly prepared. Heck why was resources
on local and state governments, when the FEDS can do it all.


I agree with what you say 'should be'. But, as we've seen, that doesn't work
unless the local and state officials are competent and use their own resources.
This time neither was true, so the feds got blamed for not solving the problem.
And, more importantly, the people suffered needlessly because of it.

Today's Wash Post highlights the problems of the feds trying to work through the
local governments to get things done. It isn't happening. As Bush is going to be
held responsible anyway, I believe the feds should just do the job. In the case
of 'where to place shelters', the feds should pick a spot and put them there,
rather than try to coordinate with the locals.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...referrer=email


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Storm jib? Stephen Trapani Cruising 8 May 11th 04 05:10 AM
Ketch storm tatics Joe ASA 56 December 20th 03 11:07 PM
I've weathered many a storm . . . Simple Simon ASA 5 November 26th 03 04:13 AM
what to do in a swamped boat in a storm? pb General 9 August 14th 03 05:33 AM
What to do in a lighting storm while Kayaking? [email protected] General 9 July 30th 03 12:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017