On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:55:18 -0400, PocoLoco wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 01:45:39 -0400, thunder wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:08:25 -0400, PocoLoco wrote:


I wonder...if the levees had failed during Clinton's watch, would you be
blaming him as strenuously?

Geez John, don't you ever get tired of being a knee-jerk apologist for the
President? Clinton hasn't been President for 5 years, get over it.

Geez, thunder, don't you ever get tired of irrationally blaming *everything* on
the Bush administration? The levee problem has been known about for years and
years. The 'blame' should be getting spread the same way!

Before this incident, had you ever heard of the 'levee problem' in New Orleans?
I sure don't recall the governor or mayor making any big fuss, until after it
broke.

Here's an article that sheds some light on the levee problem, without the
Bush-hate you guys want to rejoice in. Should Bush have done more? Sure! As
should have Clinton and all the other presidents going back to about 1900.

Whoops!

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...na_levees.html
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."