Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 20:18:01 -0400, DSK wrote:
... Wasn't she the one that ran a radio a skit that ended with MoveOn.org types busting in a shooting the president with assault rifles or something? I didn't hear that bit - just heard something about it. If true, that would be criminal. Treasonous, IMHO. OTOH I thought the right-wing calls for the assassination of Clinton were equally treasonous. PocoLoco wrote: My two best friends are lefties. We argue, we joke, we both put Bush down (for various things), and we both put Kerry down (for various things). We don't call each other names, and we don't take our disagreements to the level of obscene, irrational hatred exhibited by some on this group. You mean, like calling somebody "sick" because he doesn't share your enthusiasm for bigotry & fascism? Because he doesn't find anything funny about your imaginary tales about black looters stealing liquor? I have a number of friends who are Bush supporters. We don't discuss politics, because they invariably get PO'd at any suggestion that President Bush isn't perfect & wonderful. OTOH I'm not enthusiastic when other people begin cutting him down The political poison has spread, and the infection is doing great harm to America. DSK Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PocoLoco wrote:
Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. Well, let's see... is the group who spent tens of millions of dollars telling lies about a Presidential candidate's military record? Or is it the party whose candidate served in the military, but avoided the war and whose records were conveniently lost? Is it the group who, more than four and a half years later, is *still* blaming their problems on their predecessor? Is it the group who fought tooth & nail to prevent many citizens from voting? Is it the group who thinks it's perfectly OK to lock people up with no evidence, no trial, and if that's not enough, torture them? Is it the group who insists that everything is fine & dandy with sending our families off to a war against terrorism, and then squashes true reporting of the world terrorism situation because it's not flattering? Is it the group that talks a lot about accountability & morality, but somehow blames everything wrong on others, regularly launches vicious character assassinations (and in some cases talks loudly about real assasination) as a political ploy, and is currently under investigation for over half a billion dollars worth of crooked contracting? I could go on & on, but I think you get the point. DSK |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:45:20 -0400, DSK wrote:
PocoLoco wrote: Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. Well, let's see... is the group who spent tens of millions of dollars telling lies about a Presidential candidate's military record? Or is it the party whose candidate served in the military, but avoided the war and whose records were conveniently lost? Is it the group who, more than four and a half years later, is *still* blaming their problems on their predecessor? republicans do that. they blamed carter for everything under the sun until clinton was elected. --------------------------- to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com" and enter 'wf3h' in the field |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:45:20 -0400, DSK wrote:
PocoLoco wrote: Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. Well, let's see... is the group who spent tens of millions of dollars telling lies about a Presidential candidate's military record? Or is it the party whose candidate served in the military, but avoided the war and whose records were conveniently lost? Is it the group who, more than four and a half years later, is *still* blaming their problems on their predecessor? Is it the group who fought tooth & nail to prevent many citizens from voting? Is it the group who thinks it's perfectly OK to lock people up with no evidence, no trial, and if that's not enough, torture them? Is it the group who insists that everything is fine & dandy with sending our families off to a war against terrorism, and then squashes true reporting of the world terrorism situation because it's not flattering? Is it the group that talks a lot about accountability & morality, but somehow blames everything wrong on others, regularly launches vicious character assassinations (and in some cases talks loudly about real assasination) as a political ploy, and is currently under investigation for over half a billion dollars worth of crooked contracting? I could go on & on, but I think you get the point. DSK Get local. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:45:20 -0400, DSK wrote: PocoLoco wrote: Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. Well, let's see... is the group who spent tens of millions of dollars telling lies about a Presidential candidate's military record? Or is it the party whose candidate served in the military, but avoided the war and whose records were conveniently lost? Is it the group who, more than four and a half years later, is *still* blaming their problems on their predecessor? Is it the group who fought tooth & nail to prevent many citizens from voting? Is it the group who thinks it's perfectly OK to lock people up with no evidence, no trial, and if that's not enough, torture them? Is it the group who insists that everything is fine & dandy with sending our families off to a war against terrorism, and then squashes true reporting of the world terrorism situation because it's not flattering? Is it the group that talks a lot about accountability & morality, but somehow blames everything wrong on others, regularly launches vicious character assassinations (and in some cases talks loudly about real assasination) as a political ploy, and is currently under investigation for over half a billion dollars worth of crooked contracting? I could go on & on, but I think you get the point. DSK Get local. Be easy on him, he's suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:35:21 -0400, "P. Fritz"
wrote: "PocoLoco" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:45:20 -0400, DSK wrote: PocoLoco wrote: Look around, Doug, and see who the poison spreaders are. Well, let's see... is the group who spent tens of millions of dollars telling lies about a Presidential candidate's military record? Or is it the party whose candidate served in the military, but avoided the war and whose records were conveniently lost? Is it the group who, more than four and a half years later, is *still* blaming their problems on their predecessor? Is it the group who fought tooth & nail to prevent many citizens from voting? Is it the group who thinks it's perfectly OK to lock people up with no evidence, no trial, and if that's not enough, torture them? Is it the group who insists that everything is fine & dandy with sending our families off to a war against terrorism, and then squashes true reporting of the world terrorism situation because it's not flattering? Is it the group that talks a lot about accountability & morality, but somehow blames everything wrong on others, regularly launches vicious character assassinations (and in some cases talks loudly about real assasination) as a political ploy, and is currently under investigation for over half a billion dollars worth of crooked contracting? I could go on & on, but I think you get the point. DSK Get local. Be easy on him, he's suffering from Bush Derangement Syndrome -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." He's suffering all right. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
PocoLoco wrote:
He's suffering all right. We're *all* suffering. DSK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bad day on the Chesapeake Bay! | General | |||
Who voted for Bush v Kerry | General | |||
OT Claims Vs. Facts from BushCo. | General | |||
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER | General |