"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Gorf" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:38:04 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



I intend to live long enough to see it happen. I just hope Congressman
Weldon does too.



You sure you want to see where this goes???

Sure. Let the chips fall where they may. Like I said, I'm not so
interested in seeing who to pin the 9/11 blame on. That's history, and
hopefully we'll learn from it. I'm more interested in seeing who has
committed crimes by trying to cover it up...and why.

"It's not the crime. It's the coverup"


I agree 911 commission was involved in cover-ups. It was a bi-partisan
commission. The info about Atta and Clinton was most likely omitted to
accommodate omissions about Bush. Remember one of the main premises for
freedom in the USA is that you are innocent until proven guilty. In that
regard, Atta had done nothing in 2000, so he could not be arrested. Clinton
lawyers were right, otherwise we end up with Nazi rule and the Gestapo
making people disappear in the middle of the night.

If you like conspiracy theories here's one you will love:
Conspiracy: 9/11 - Alleged Cover-ups

The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat...ost29388 9167

"Gorf" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Gorf" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:38:04 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



I intend to live long enough to see it happen. I just hope
Congressman
Weldon does too.



You sure you want to see where this goes???

Sure. Let the chips fall where they may. Like I said, I'm not so
interested in seeing who to pin the 9/11 blame on. That's history, and
hopefully we'll learn from it. I'm more interested in seeing who has
committed crimes by trying to cover it up...and why.

"It's not the crime. It's the coverup"


I agree 911 commission was involved in cover-ups. It was a bi-partisan
commission. The info about Atta and Clinton was most likely omitted to
accommodate omissions about Bush. Remember one of the main premises for
freedom in the USA is that you are innocent until proven guilty. In that
regard, Atta had done nothing in 2000, so he could not be arrested.
Clinton
lawyers were right, otherwise we end up with Nazi rule and the Gestapo
making people disappear in the middle of the night.

So you prefer the death of 3000 Americans over the violation of the "rights"
of a non-US citizen?

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Gorf" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Gorf" wrote in message
om...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:38:04 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



I intend to live long enough to see it happen. I just hope
Congressman
Weldon does too.



You sure you want to see where this goes???

Sure. Let the chips fall where they may. Like I said, I'm not so
interested in seeing who to pin the 9/11 blame on. That's history, and
hopefully we'll learn from it. I'm more interested in seeing who has
committed crimes by trying to cover it up...and why.

"It's not the crime. It's the coverup"


I agree 911 commission was involved in cover-ups. It was a bi-partisan
commission. The info about Atta and Clinton was most likely omitted to
accommodate omissions about Bush. Remember one of the main premises for
freedom in the USA is that you are innocent until proven guilty. In
that
regard, Atta had done nothing in 2000, so he could not be arrested.
Clinton
lawyers were right, otherwise we end up with Nazi rule and the Gestapo
making people disappear in the middle of the night.

So you prefer the death of 3000 Americans over the violation of the
"rights"
of a non-US citizen?


BUSH said it himself "If we let this change the American way of life then
the terrorist have won."

As far as Atta - hindsight is always 20-20 isn't it? NO ONE, not Clinton,
not you, not God himself knew what was going to happen - or it WOULD have
been averted.

Am I willing to give into a police state out of fear of what MIGHT be? Hell
NO!

NOBBY wrote
So you prefer the death of 3000 Americans over the violation of the
"rights" of a non-US citizen?


Gorf wrote:
BUSH said it himself "If we let this change the American way of life then
the terrorist have won."

As far as Atta - hindsight is always 20-20 isn't it? NO ONE, not Clinton,
not you, not God himself knew what was going to happen - or it WOULD have
been averted.

Am I willing to give into a police state out of fear of what MIGHT be? Hell
NO!


First of all, you gotta recognize Nobby for what he is... a socialist
(in fact I think of him as an ouotright Trotskyite or Bolshevist) who is
trying his best to make the imperialist running-dogs look bad, and thus
hasten the arrival of the world worker's state. Da, Comrade Nobby?

That's why NOBBY posts his clownishly fascist statements and his
pre-kindergarten economic theories, to discredit those he appears to be
siding with.

2ndly, statements like "would you prefer to protect the rights of a
non-American" is basically a nicer sounding way of saying "You really
should understand, that torture is good when *we* do it, that it's
morally OK to kill furriners, and you only have the rights that the
gov't lets you have."

I hope this helps with you comprehension of future off-topic posts.

DSK