| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:28:21 -0400, John H. wrote: Actually, there are both, Red States and Blue States. Perhaps, that is part of the problem. Too many states, all pointing at one another. I realize clean up will be difficult, as most of the problem is non-single point pollution, but the Clean Water Act passed in 1972. That is more than enough time, and IMO both parties are deserving of the blame. Agreed! The environment is a sad commentary on Washington's failing system. Fully 2/3 of American's want the government to do more to clean up our living spaces. It's an issue that transcends party affiliations, yet, the Chesapeake still needs life support. I don't understand it, the environmental *and* economic benefits of a clean Chesapeake far outweigh the clean-up costs. If tourists had a lobbying group, like farmers, or chemical & oil companies, things might change. How dependent is the bay on tourism? Or, boating/fishing, for that matter? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Boat Sales Statistics, WA STATE, 3rd QTR | General | |||
| Dismal news - State of the Chesapeake Bay | General | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||