Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.

"NOYB" wrote
In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in
economics.


Now *that's* funny.

Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of
physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a
dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built.

DSK

  #32   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring

because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.


What proof of this wild allegation do you have?


He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.


  #33   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.

Doug Kanter wrote:
He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.


Actually, that's one of my problems with the whole Bush Administration
and their fans... they seem to have trouble distinguishing between a
President (or Vice President) and a dictator.

DSK

  #34   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.

Actually, the original plan came about in the late 1980's.....

But the plan was sidetracked by a new direction of planting a bomb under one
tower to get it to fall into the other...

But then again, I really can't expect you to know history that well, you
seem to be one that likes to make history up as you go.


"NOYB" wrote in message
news

wrote in message
ink.net...
Were picked for a "very secret mission"

There is nothing here that said the mission had been planned, there is
nothing that says where this happened, unless of course you follow

history
back and find that Atta was supposed to be living in Hamburg at that

time.

Granted, it might have been thought of, but planned, I doubt.


You're nuts. In 1996, they discussed using planes as weapons. In 1999,
they recruited the terrorists and sent them to flight school. What do you
suppose that was for? In case al Qaeda got it's hands on some F-16's and
decided to form an air force?

The plan was set in the late 90's. It was carried out just 2 years after
Atta, et al, were recruited. They didn't disclose the final details of

the
plan to the hijackers until Feb. 2001.






  #35   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:_abqc.12958
Without it, we'd probably still be in a deep
recession.

This based upon your liberal arts studies of economics?


In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in
economics.


I guess not of it really *hit home* then, did it?


"not of it really hit home"? It appears that I retained more from Econ than
you did from English.




  #36   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"DSK" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote
In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in
economics.


Now *that's* funny.

Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of
physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a
dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built.


I still build bridges, but it'd be impossible to drive across any of 'em.


  #37   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done.

I
can't imagine what he could do worse


I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a

deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.


They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.


So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused?


Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US
using terrorist mercenaries.

And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens?


Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't.


If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?


See my answers above.


France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.


Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?


No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations to
secretly wage war against the US.

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.


Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.


Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so?


al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.


How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?


Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after 9/11...and
left the Middle East.


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring

because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.


What proof of this wild allegation do you have?


Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of
combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers.



  #38   Report Post  
Mike Dobony
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"Jim" wrote in message
news

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Consider that from the time he was elected to Arkansas, the

Republicans
set
out to get him. He is the most investigated president in History

(possibly
the most investigated US citizen). Hundreds of millions of dollars

have
been spent investigating him, his wife, and others in his

administration;
yet all the could pin on him is a blow job (which BTW is NOT

considered
having sex in D.C.)

IN SPITE of all the distractions, he let the nation to prosperity, Not

1
soldier he sent into battle failed to return (before someone hollers
Somalia, I'll remind you that Bush the first sent the military there).

Probably more millionaires were created during his 2 terms than any

other,
we were on good terms with most of the world.

Now as to the "accomplishments" of Bush

The US homeland was attack -- our defense was laughable -- not one

plane
in
the air to defend the pentagon, in spite of over a hours warning. He
promised to get those responsible, but hasn't.

The economy is in the tank

Joblessness is up

He has alienated most of the civilized world

Ordered 700+ of our sons and daughters to their death. Untold numbers

have
been wounded.

We are mired in a conflict that seems unresolovable unless we admit

defeat
and pull out

He has inspired fanatic suicide bombers to kill Americans whenever

possible

His administration is the most secretive in my memory. -- Allegations

of
Big
Business involvement are everywhere

His VP, and daddy are still connected with business that profits from

war
(Halliburton and the Carlyle Group )

There are numerous connections between the Bush family and the Saudi's

Bush Jr., is an embarrassment every time he speaks to the public

because
of
his lack of proper english

What could be worse???


Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done. I
can't imagine what he could do worse



A cry-baby might have done better? GIVE ME A BREAK! Thank Clinton/Gore for
REFUSING to go after terrorists after the numerous attacks during their
regime. Blame CLINTON for the economy since it takes a minimum of 2 years
to effect the economy and the downward spiral started while Clinton was in
power. And what about all the murders of those who were going to testify
against the Clintons? What about the shame they brought to the US
throughout the world by their criminal activities. What about deliberately
lying to Congress, UNDER OATH! What about their refusal to prosecute sex
offenders, actually DEFENDING child molesters? What about the Democrat's
refusal to control spending? What about the Democrat's support of
terrorists and refusal to supply the military with what is necessary for our
troop's survival and effectiveness? Maybe you would rather have Kerry, who
called the US troops fighting in Vietnam war criminals? Would he have the
guts to go after terrorists? NOT ON YOUR LIFE! He SUPPORTS terrorists!

--
Mike D.

www.stopassaultnow.org

Remove .spamnot to respond by email



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.682 / Virus Database: 444 - Release Date: 5/11/2004


  #39   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.


"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"DSK" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote
In undergrad, I majored in Mechanical Engineering, with a minor in
economics.


Now *that's* funny.

Nobby, did any of your engineering profs tell you that the laws of
physics can be trumped by faith & ideology? No wonder you became a
dentist, I would be afraid to drive over any bridge you built.


I still build bridges, but it'd be impossible to drive across any of 'em.



I'd would not want to deive across any bridge designed by a mechanical
engineer. :-)
But then I would not want a podiatrist to perform brain surgery either.


  #40   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) On Clinton vs Bush.

"Mike Dobony" wrote in message
...


A cry-baby might have done better? GIVE ME A BREAK! Thank Clinton/Gore

for
REFUSING to go after terrorists after the numerous attacks during their
regime. Blame CLINTON for the economy since it takes a minimum of 2 years
to effect the economy and the downward spiral started while Clinton was in
power. And what about all the murders of those who were going to testify
against the Clintons? What about the shame they brought to the US
throughout the world by their criminal activities. What about

deliberately
lying to Congress, UNDER OATH! What about their refusal to prosecute sex
offenders, actually DEFENDING child molesters? What about the Democrat's
refusal to control spending? What about the Democrat's support of
terrorists and refusal to supply the military with what is necessary for

our
troop's survival and effectiveness? Maybe you would rather have Kerry,

who
called the US troops fighting in Vietnam war criminals? Would he have the
guts to go after terrorists? NOT ON YOUR LIFE! He SUPPORTS terrorists!

--
Mike D.

www.stopassaultnow.org


I wish I could find the link which describes numerous occasions at the White
House when the Clintons would tell the Secret Service guys to get lost while
they barbecued children they'd kidnapped in local parks.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER Henry Blackmoore General 3 April 7th 04 10:03 PM
( OT ) Creepier than Nixon -- Worse than Watergate Jim General 7 April 2nd 04 08:12 PM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017