"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done. I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused? And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens? If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.

Doug Kanter wrote:
He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.

Actually, that's one of my problems with the whole Bush Administration
and their fans... they seem to have trouble distinguishing between a
President (or Vice President) and a dictator.

DSK

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.

LOL. Pot, kettle, black. It is *your side* which has been blaming Bush for
the actions of some perverts snapping pictures of naked Iraqis.

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

He thinks the president runs every single aspect of the government.

LOL. Pot, kettle, black. It is *your side* which has been blaming Bush
for
the actions of some perverts snapping pictures of naked Iraqis.



No, dummy. My major complaint with Bush, with regard to the prison mess, is
that he hasn't rolled any heads yet. Among other things, one important
quality of a good boss is knowing when the use of terror is appropriate with
employees. Sadly, your president talks a good video game, but he's actually
quite the pussy.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done.
I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a
deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused?

Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US
using terrorist mercenaries.

And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens?

Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't.


If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

See my answers above.


France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations to
secretly wage war against the US.

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so?


al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after 9/11...and
left the Middle East.


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of
combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers.

"NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done.
I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a
deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused?

Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US
using terrorist mercenaries.

And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens?

Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't.


If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

See my answers above.


France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations to
secretly wage war against the US.

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so?


al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after 9/11...and
left the Middle East.


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of
combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers.


Now we are getting somewhere. So, I take it, by your above answers,
that you really don't buy into BushCos rhetoric about freeing Iraqis,
and making there lives better through democracy? Good, the intelligent
people of the U.S. have known that was pure horse**** from the
beginning!! Thank you for realizing it, also. Now if you could just
get the rest of your right wing fanatics to believe it, we could get
Bush out of the white house.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have
done.
I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived
recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a
deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control
Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused?

Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US
using terrorist mercenaries.

And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens?

Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't.


If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

See my answers above.


France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations
to
secretly wage war against the US.

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so?


al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after
9/11...and
left the Middle East.


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of
combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers.


Now we are getting somewhere. So, I take it, by your above answers,
that you really don't buy into BushCos rhetoric about freeing Iraqis,
and making there lives better through democracy?

No, that's being offered for the bleeding heart simpletons.



Good, the intelligent
people of the U.S. have known that was pure horse**** from the
beginning!!

And the really intelligent people see Iraq as just a cog in the wheel of our
fight on terrorism. It provides a strategic geographical location in the
Middle East to act as a staging area against terrorist groups in the region.
It also provides the necessary oil flow we'll need while Saudi Arabia goes
through its struggle against the Wahhabi fundametalists.


Thank you for realizing it, also. Now if you could just
get the rest of your right wing fanatics to believe it, we could get
Bush out of the white house.

You obviously don't fall among the "really intelligent people".

On Wed, 19 May 2004 12:07:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:


And the really intelligent people see Iraq as just a cog in the wheel of
our fight on terrorism. It provides a strategic geographical location in
the Middle East to act as a staging area against terrorist groups in the
region. It also provides the necessary oil flow we'll need while Saudi
Arabia goes through its struggle against the Wahhabi fundametalists.

Unless it is just for my consumption, you know, a less intelligent
*voter*, there is considerable talk about cutting and running for your
assessment to hold water. I believe your neocon dream has long since gone
by the wayside.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3721491.stm

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...nt_1474638.htm

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=34670

"NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done.
I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a
deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused?

Nope. I thought about Saddam waging his own private war against the US
using terrorist mercenaries.

And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens?

Nope. I really didn't care...and still don't.


If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

See my answers above.


France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

No. At that time, Saddam wasn't teaming up with terrorist organizations to
secretly wage war against the US.

Sure they were, you twit!!! They have ALWAYS been scheming against the
U.S., as to them, we are satanists.

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

Bush/Cheney are profiting? How so?

Do you not think that they have holdings in the companies hired? Are
you REALLY that blind?


al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

Because algore would have given in to bin Laden's demands after 9/11...and
left the Middle East.

How do you know this? Any proof?


And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring
because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?

Al Gore would have just continued with the Reno Justice Dept. method of
combatting terrorism. Arrest the surviving suicide bombers.

Again do you have any proof of this? Or, like BushCo, just like to
spew rhetoric? Do you call the above statement the "proof" that I
asked for?