"NOYB" wrote in message news:jd7qc.12789
Gore could have been President during all of this?

YES, and we will never know how well (or poorly) he might have done. I
can't imagine what he could do worse

I can. By all measures, we experienced a *very* short-lived recession
thanks to the Bush tax cut. Without it, we'd probably still be in a deep
recession. Additionally, the Taliban would still control Afghanistan.

They pretty much still are, and as soon as we leave, they will be in
full charge again, so just what have we accomplished there?

Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq.

So what? Did you HONESTLY, before Bush lied us into Iraq, think about
Iraqi citizens being abused? And were those thoughts of how we could
releive the suffering of those citizens? If so, then why now do you
make statements like we should nuke them all?

France, Russia and China would
still be selling banned weapons to Iraq.

Have a problem with governments selling weapons to Iraq? Did you have
the same concerns when the United States (Rumsfield) did the same?

UN officials would still be
skimming billions off the oil-for-food program.

Only difference is, now it's US that's doing that, by way of "private
contractors", and Bush/Cheney are profiting.

al Qaeda would be stronger
than ever, and probably control the oil coming from the Middle East.

How do you know that al Qaeda "would be stronger than ever" and
"control the oil coming from the Middle East"?

And
numerous additional domestic terrorist attacks would be occurring because
algore would be dealing with each attack as a law enforcement issue.

What proof of this wild allegation do you have?