NOYB wrote:

Liberals seem to quote a lot of anonymous sources. Is that because most
people don't want to admit to talking to liberals? Or is it because liberals
lie about their sources?

It's because the few neocons who are bothered by the stink of a decaying
regime are still too frightened to speak openly.

Read a few history books, NOYB. Without exception they show you the
course of the next few years. It's a shame Bush has never read one.

Rick

"Rick" wrote in message
. net...
NOYB wrote:

Liberals seem to quote a lot of anonymous sources. Is that because most
people don't want to admit to talking to liberals? Or is it because
liberals
lie about their sources?

It's because the few neocons who are bothered by the stink of a decaying
regime are still too frightened to speak openly.

Read a few history books, NOYB. Without exception they show you the
course of the next few years. It's a shame Bush has never read one.

Rick


Phillippines. In between a million other things, I've been working my way
through a great book on our little adventure there. There are paragraphs
which could be dropped verbatim into a current newspaper article on Iraq,
and still be 100% accurate. And, there are entire chapters which fit the
current situation perfectly if the names of the politicians were changed.
There's even a latter-day Michael Moo Mark Twain.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

"jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

From NewsMax:
Two former weapons inspectors, Hans Blix and David Kay, said the shell
was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did
not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons

From Jihad watch, AP:
"A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered inoperable.
This produced a very small dispersal of agent," he said.

Now, where does any of this say that, 1)the bomb was "Sarin filled",
and 2)that this indicates that we've found stockpiles of WMDs, or that
such stockpiles exist?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

From NewsMax:
Two former weapons inspectors, Hans Blix and David Kay, said the shell
was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did
not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons

From Jihad watch, AP:
"A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered inoperable.
This produced a very small dispersal of agent," he said.

Now, where does any of this say that, 1)the bomb was "Sarin filled",
and 2)that this indicates that we've found stockpiles of WMDs, or that
such stockpiles exist?

Try a bit more googling dummy. The bomb that exploded was reported as
containing 3 or 4 liters of sarin.

Saddam used these bombs on his own people. Are you saying they never
existed? LMAO!

You really are stupid.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

3-4 liters of sarin is much more than a trace.


Wednesday, May 19, 2004

NEW YORK - Tests on an artillery shell that blew up in Iraq on Saturday
confirm that it did contain an estimated three or four liters of the deadly
nerve agent sarin,Defense Department officials told Fox News Tuesday.

"jim--" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

From NewsMax:
Two former weapons inspectors, Hans Blix and David Kay, said the shell
was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did
not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons

From Jihad watch, AP:
"A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered inoperable.
This produced a very small dispersal of agent," he said.

Now, where does any of this say that, 1)the bomb was "Sarin filled",
and 2)that this indicates that we've found stockpiles of WMDs, or that
such stockpiles exist?

Try a bit more googling dummy. The bomb that exploded was reported as
containing 3 or 4 liters of sarin.

Saddam used these bombs on his own people. Are you saying they never
existed? LMAO!

You really are stupid.

I'm stupid? Hell, man, apparently you don't even know how to read. The
stories that you are quoting, are saying that the bomb found had the
POTENTIAL to contain 3 or 4 liters. How to hell stupid are you? THERE
WAS A "VERY SMALL DISPERSAL OF AGENT". Do you understand that?
Probably not.

"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

3-4 liters of sarin is much more than a trace.


Wednesday, May 19, 2004

NEW YORK - Tests on an artillery shell that blew up in Iraq on Saturday
confirm that it did contain an estimated three or four liters of the deadly
nerve agent sarin,Defense Department officials told Fox News Tuesday.

Yeah, Fox News. How about this DIRECTLY from the Dept. of Defense website:
From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have
read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

From NewsMax:
Two former weapons inspectors, Hans Blix and David Kay, said the shell
was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did
not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons

From Jihad watch, AP:
"A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered inoperable.
This produced a very small dispersal of agent," he said.

Now, where does any of this say that, 1)the bomb was "Sarin filled",
and 2)that this indicates that we've found stockpiles of WMDs, or that
such stockpiles exist?

Try a bit more googling dummy. The bomb that exploded was reported as
containing 3 or 4 liters of sarin.

Saddam used these bombs on his own people. Are you saying they never
existed? LMAO!

You really are stupid.

I'm stupid? Hell, man, apparently you don't even know how to read. The
stories that you are quoting, are saying that the bomb found had the
POTENTIAL to contain 3 or 4 liters. How to hell stupid are you? THERE
WAS A "VERY SMALL DISPERSAL OF AGENT". Do you understand that?
Probably not.

I did not quote any stories.

Yes, you are stupid. You prove it every day, as you just did.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message news:Ud6qc.14427
Depends upon if you're upwind or downwind after a sarin-filled
munition
is
detonated, eh?

You need to at least learn to read, and comprehend what you have
read.
"Sarin filled"????? It was found to have TRACES of Sarin!!!!!!

No dummy, it was found to have "contained" sarin.

From the Coalition Provisional Authority Briefing, Department of
Defense:

The round had been rigged as an IED, which was discovered by a U.S.
force convoy. A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered
inoperable. This produced a very small dispersal of agent.

From NewsMax:
Two former weapons inspectors, Hans Blix and David Kay, said the shell
was likely a stray weapon that had been scavenged by militants and did
not signify that Iraq had large stockpiles of such weapons

From Jihad watch, AP:
"A detonation occurred before the IED could be rendered inoperable.
This produced a very small dispersal of agent," he said.

Now, where does any of this say that, 1)the bomb was "Sarin filled",
and 2)that this indicates that we've found stockpiles of WMDs, or that
such stockpiles exist?

Try a bit more googling dummy. The bomb that exploded was reported as
containing 3 or 4 liters of sarin.

Saddam used these bombs on his own people. Are you saying they never
existed? LMAO!

You really are stupid.

I'm stupid? Hell, man, apparently you don't even know how to read. The
stories that you are quoting, are saying that the bomb found had the
POTENTIAL to contain 3 or 4 liters.

Hey Mr. Intentionally Obtuse,
The report said the following:
Tests on an artillery shell that blew up in Iraq on Saturday confirm that it
did contain an estimated three or four liters of the deadly nerve agent
sarin...

Not "pontential" to contain...*DID* contain.