Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch" wrote: ~` snippage ~~ He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me. If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody. First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to , that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect THAT'S BOATING. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dry" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch" wrote: ~` snippage ~~ He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me. If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody. First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to , that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect THAT'S BOATING. But that does not solve the problem....it is only being retaliatory. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "*JimH*" wrote in message news ![]() "Dry" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch" wrote: ~` snippage ~~ He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me. If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody. First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to , that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect THAT'S BOATING. But that does not solve the problem....it is only being retaliatory. BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch. But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *JimH* wrote in message ... BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch. But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g Methinks you have a couple of us confused in your mind there Jim. But - thanks for the thought anyway. Eisboch |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote in message ... BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch. But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g Methinks you have a couple of us confused in your mind there Jim. But - thanks for the thought anyway. Eisboch How was I wrong....perhaps on the length of the Grand Banks you purchased for her? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|