Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Dry
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch"
wrote:

~` snippage ~~

He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me.


If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims
court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody.


First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that
gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every
where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to
, that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect
THAT'S BOATING.
  #2   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dry" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch"
wrote:

~` snippage ~~

He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me.


If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims
court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody.


First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that
gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every
where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to
, that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect
THAT'S BOATING.


But that does not solve the problem....it is only being retaliatory.



  #3   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"*JimH*" wrote in message
news

"Dry" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 15:33:17 GMT, "Eisboch"
wrote:

~` snippage ~~

He denies that the boat ever left the rack and hung up on me.

If you can prove it only ad 4 hours on it, take him to small claims
court - it's obvious he used the boat while it was in his custody.


First if what your saying is true, you need to retaliate in a way that
gives you and other boaters satisfaction. Blast the Marina name every
where that you can, next do not pay the asshole, next sue or threaten to
, that's a bit of a motavator down your way, next go boating and reflect
THAT'S BOATING.


But that does not solve the problem....it is only being retaliatory.




BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch.



















But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand
Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in
swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g












  #4   Report Post  
Eisboch
 
Posts: n/a
Default


*JimH* wrote in message
...


BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch.


But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand
Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in
swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g


Methinks you have a couple of us confused in your mind there Jim. But -
thanks for the thought anyway.

Eisboch


  #5   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

*JimH* wrote in message
...


BTW: Sorry to hear about your problems Eisboch.


But then again, folks who can afford to buy his and hers 48+ foot Grand
Banks and a winter retreat in Florida (on the water with a screened in
swimming pool) deserve some grief once in a while. g


Methinks you have a couple of us confused in your mind there Jim. But -
thanks for the thought anyway.

Eisboch



How was I wrong....perhaps on the length of the Grand Banks you purchased
for her?




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017