JimH wrote:

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

Where to start?

I don't keep a running inventory, but perhaps you'll accept recent
remarks by
some other posters as a clue of just where you might begin to look.

One recently commented, to Harry Krause, that you (JimH) are simply
doing the very same thing that Harry has done here for years. (only
better) You might find that post if you do a search for the phrase
"out-Krause Krause"

Earlier in this thread, one person noted that you have "done nothing
but attack Chuck".....where do you suppose he got that idea?

Also earlier in this thread, somebody referred to you as the Avon
Assassin.
Why would somebody do that?

Maybe it's a conspiracy?

I'll let you decide.

If most people accept that you've never made any personal comments
about me, then according to the man of a thousand screen names you will
have performed another "public service" by pointing that out, right?
:-)

wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

Where to start?

I don't keep a running inventory, but perhaps you'll accept recent
remarks by
some other posters as a clue of just where you might begin to look.

One recently commented, to Harry Krause, that you (JimH) are simply
doing the very same thing that Harry has done here for years. (only
better) You might find that post if you do a search for the phrase
"out-Krause Krause"

Earlier in this thread, one person noted that you have "done nothing
but attack Chuck".....where do you suppose he got that idea?

Also earlier in this thread, somebody referred to you as the Avon
Assassin.
Why would somebody do that?

Maybe it's a conspiracy?

I'll let you decide.

If most people accept that you've never made any personal comments
about me, then according to the man of a thousand screen names you will
have performed another "public service" by pointing that out, right?
:-)


I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here. How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?

wrote in message
ups.com...



I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Sure. But it is easy to claim that I have made personal attacks on you.



Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here.

I never said I *never* did. Your claim was supposedly about recent personal
attacks I made (specific to your fluff review and SeaRay threads.

You have yet to produce any evidence of recent personal attacks on you by
me.

So once again I will ask:

Exactly what personal comments/attacks did I make about you Chuck?


How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?


Easy. I had almost as much fun using it as my son did.

Now why the personal insult to me Chuck? I thought this was just the thing
you were whining to me about.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...



I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Sure. But it is easy to claim that I have made personal attacks on you.



Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here.

I never said I *never* did. Your claim was supposedly about recent
personal attacks I made (specific to your fluff review and SeaRay threads.

You have yet to produce any evidence of recent personal attacks on you by
me.

So once again I will ask:

Exactly what personal comments/attacks did I make about you Chuck?


How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?


Easy. I had almost as much fun using it as my son did.

Now why the personal insult to me Chuck? I thought this was just the
thing you were whining to me about.


Nothing. I figured as much Chuckie.

*JimH* wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...



I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Sure. But it is easy to claim that I have made personal attacks on you.



Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here.

I never said I *never* did. Your claim was supposedly about recent
personal attacks I made (specific to your fluff review and SeaRay threads.

You have yet to produce any evidence of recent personal attacks on you by
me.

So once again I will ask:

Exactly what personal comments/attacks did I make about you Chuck?


How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?


Easy. I had almost as much fun using it as my son did.

Now why the personal insult to me Chuck? I thought this was just the
thing you were whining to me about.


Nothing. I figured as much Chuckie.

What were you expecting, Jimbo?

Allow me to jog your selective memory:

This is the thread where you demanded that I apologize for revealing
your phone number and home address. Remember?

This is the thread where, when you realized the link to the ad did
*not* reveal your phone number and home address you then claimed that
you had somehow "edited" the ad between the time I had posted the link
and the following day. Remember?

This is the thread where, when nobody- not even your usually devoted
sidekicks- stepped forward to confirm that the ad had ever contained
your home address and phone number and others said that when they
followed the link they did *not* see the phone number and address that
you claimed had been revealed, you finally apologized for lying about
the supposed revelation of your phone number (as well as the
non-existant editing) and explained to one and all that you only did so
because you felt "cornered" by your original false (or erroneous)
charge and couldn't think of an alternative. Remember?

I am really surprised that you would refresh this thread. Do you wear a
"kick me" sign when you visit a biker bar? Do they even have biker bars
for mopeds?

wrote:

I am really surprised that you would refresh this thread. Do you wear a
"kick me" sign when you visit a biker bar? Do they even have biker bars
for mopeds?

That's the Grand Poobah of Assholes United for you!