P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals



Hey, Fritz. You're probably still in orbital ecstasy afer the
appearance of GWB on TV last night attempting to resell the war in
Iraq. That being the case, you can be excused for overlooking the fact
that I told bass I thought the photo itself was funny, but that it
didn't need to be used to flame another person in the NG. Same
standard. Typical practice for "liberals". :-)

Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?


wrote in message
ups.com...


P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals



Hey, Fritz. You're probably still in orbital ecstasy afer the
appearance of GWB on TV last night attempting to resell the war in
Iraq. That being the case, you can be excused for overlooking the fact
that I told bass I thought the photo itself was funny, but that it
didn't need to be used to flame another person in the NG. Same
standard. Typical practice for "liberals". :-)

"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?

Nor is it the same standard he applied to the photo about Kevin.

JimH is right on, when backed into a corner.......chuck starts to spin.



wrote in message
ups.com...


P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals



Hey, Fritz. You're probably still in orbital ecstasy afer the
appearance of GWB on TV last night attempting to resell the war in
Iraq. That being the case, you can be excused for overlooking the fact
that I told bass I thought the photo itself was funny, but that it
didn't need to be used to flame another person in the NG. Same
standard. Typical practice for "liberals". :-)

Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?

Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?

Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.

Oh, Look. "You are a worhtless piece of ****" would also fall into that
category of personal comments you claim you never make.

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?

Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join
Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.

Oh, Look. "You are a worhtless piece of ****" would also fall into that
category of personal comments you claim you never make.


Yep, guilty as charged. I had not, however, made personal attacks or
personal comments about you prior to your internet stalking of me this
morning, even though you claimed I did (but could never offer proof).

And you will see more of the same comments from this point on as you are,
indeed, a worthless piece of crap.

Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.


wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

Which is none. Chuck Gould is an internet stalking piece of garbage. He
proved that today.


"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.