LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"DSK" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Unnamed sources, eh Doug?


???

The Army and the CIA are 'unnamed sources'?


You're being intentionally obtuse. Specifically, which members of the Army
and CIA?


... These are the words of the Prime Minister of Iraq. Since he's
there, he's in a lot better position to evaluate the situation than you
and a bunch of unnamed sources


He's also a politician, and likely to say a lot of things that aren't
quite strictly true... possibly he's been misinformed himself, possibly
trying to put a spin things, possibly trying to curry favor with the
Bush/Cheney Administration.

So, are you going to address the question here? What sources did Vice
President Cheney use to gather his info that the insurgency is on it's
last legs?


Perhaps he asked the Prime Minister.


Do you agree with his statement?


Yes. The "insurgency" was composed of the Saddam faithful who tried to get
the American forces out of there. The terrorists are a completely different
group.

What about President Bush's statement... only last night... that the U.S.
military *will* withdraw from Iraq? Wanna revise your statement that we'll
be there forever?


Nope. We'll always have bases there. We just won't have a US troop
presence in the major cities.


And how about President Bush linking Iraq with Sept 11th... again & again?
I was surprised to hear him mention Osama Bin Laden,


A lot of things surprise you. All along, Bush has spoken of Iraq's ties to
terrorists. I doubt there's a single American that doesn't believe we're
fighting al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq right now.

since he remains uncaptured and since it's now public knowledge that Bush
pulled troops off the hunt so as to invade Iraq. I was also surprised to
hear him say that the Army didn't want more troops. If that's true, then
why did Rumsfeld fire all those generals for saying we would need more
troops?


Which generals?

Why is the Army upset about missing recruiting goals if they don't need
more?


They don't need more in Iraq.

These little inconsistencies tend to make one believe that either Bush &
Cheney are seriously deluded, or else they are politically constrained
from admitting the truth. Maybe you can explain?


I already did.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
52-pound Striper Sets Maryland Record Butch Davis General 1 May 21st 05 03:57 PM
She's a sheelback in record time [email protected] ASA 19 December 10th 04 09:07 PM
Shellback in Record time [email protected] ASA 0 December 8th 04 04:00 PM
( ot ) The Bush Record Exposed Jim General 4 September 20th 04 07:52 PM
( OT )Kerry's Navy record withstands scrutiny Jim General 0 April 24th 04 01:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017