| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kevin,
No one is saying you should not be able to own a BB gun. No one is saying you should not be able to pick up a stick. They are saying you should not be able to shot a cars with a BB gun. They are saying you should not be able to hit anyone with stick. While you can be fun to play with, when you make it so easy, and you fail to see the obvious, it can get old. wrote in message oups.com... Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it
comes to something personal. When it comes to somthing personal???? I'm deffinately pro-gun. ALL firearms ( that includes BB and pellet OR maybe you exclude those) should be used in a legal, lawful manner. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, how about saying just that, John. You made a mistake. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is one sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in northern GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"." Idiot. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, Good. Time to move on Kevin. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is one sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in northern GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"." Idiot. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, Good. Time to move on Kevin. Oh, Jim, can you possibly get more childish?? I thought that sort of **** was beneath you, and I was certainly correct in my assumptions that you've reverted back to your childish actions. You should be ashamed of yourself. You deliberately snipped my reply to make it sound like I was admitting something. I thought for awhile that you'd changed, but by doing the above childish actions, you've proven yourself worthy of Fritz's charms. Too bad you don't have the mental capacity to debate something without stooping so damned low. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is one sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in northern GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"." Idiot. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, Good. Time to move on Kevin. Oh, Jim, can you possibly get more childish?? I thought that sort of **** was beneath you, and I was certainly correct in my assumptions that you've reverted back to your childish actions. You should be ashamed of yourself. You deliberately snipped my reply to make it sound like I was admitting something. I thought for awhile that you'd changed, but by doing the above childish actions, you've proven yourself worthy of Fritz's charms. Too bad you don't have the mental capacity to debate something without stooping so damned low. You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to another. I should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should not have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others when you don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'. Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should* have called you brainless. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is one sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in northern GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"." Idiot. You forgot "King of the NG" Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, Good. Time to move on Kevin. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The kid could be on the side of the road in front of the vehicle, on an overpass in front of the vehicle. I had a company car that got hit by a quart bottle of liquid dropped from an overpass and there was major damage to the window frame where it hit. Lucked out that he was a second slow in dropping or it would have come through the windshield. We have had people killed by people rocks dropped off overpasses, as well as snipers have killed people. Is a serious case of terrorism to the drivers when there is a sniper loose. |
Hybrid Mode
