Kevin,

Yes they would have arrested anyone who shot at passing cars with any gun,
they would have arrested anyone who dropped something off a bridge on
passing cars. The law they charge the person with is "Terroristic Threats".
They have arrested and charged and people have been found guilty of such
crimes for many years. I can remember in the 60's when kids were arrested
and charged for Terroristic Threats for dropping pebbles off a bridge onto
passing cars. I can also remember a time in the 70's when people were
convicted of shooting a BB gun at the LI express.

The fact you do not believe the police would charge kids or anyone else for
shooting at cars with a BB gun speaks volumes about you. Anyone with a
brain are glad the police do not allow kids to shot BB guns at passing cars.


wrote in message
oups.com...


John Jay wrote:
Kevin,
I know you know people could be prosecuted for terrorist acts way before
their was a Homeland Security Act. What makes you think this crime and
the
prosecution of this crime has anything to do with the Homeland Security
Act?

It's simple, try to follow along, okay? The Homeland Security Act
simply made it easier to convict persons. Do you HONESTLY think that
before the act, that they would arrest a couple of kids sitting on a
hill with a damned BB gun shooting at the sides of cars with
TERRORISTIC acts? Come on!!!!!

You must make liberals cringe whenever you open you mouth. You are an
embarrassment to liberals all over the world.

And because of your narrow mindedness, you're an embarrassment to
yourself! But, the Right Wing Circle Jerk Club will love you for it!