"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...

On 16-Jun-2005, "rick" wrote:

Beause you've failed to make your case against the other sites
I
have read.

How about - the sites you identified are irrelevant to the
discussion.
Just because they talk about waterline length means nothing in
the
context of comparing waterline length and overall length.

No, you did not answer the question I asked. You snipped it
out,
and ignored it. Why is that?

Probably because your line of questions is not contributing to
the
discussion. You just want to nit-pik on trivia.
====================
No I did not. I asked you to explain YOUR statement about the
"many factors" that affect speed other than length. You are the
one nit-picking on definitions.



The _fact_ is that overall length is not a reasonable indicator
of kayak performance. Waterline length may be, other factors
being equal. If you can't deal with that, there's nothing I
can
do about it.
=================
Obviously you can't. thanks anyway. I'll wait for somebody else
to explain all those other factors someday. Obviously you can't.



Mike