Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... wrote in message news ![]() I have never quoted from either of those sources in this newsgroup. And I don't need to verify.. If you want it believed, then source it http://abcnews.go.com/sections/world...sar021231.html This story appears to be from December 31, 2002 yet gives nothing definitive in a Saddam - Al Al-Qaeda connection... Only speculation http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0402/p01s03-wome.html And this story clearly states "The Al Qaeda-Kurdish ties appear to have grown closer by the summer of 2000" If I remember correctly, Saddam was out to kill the Kurds..... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,101635,00.html That information is the first solid evidence of links between remnants of Saddam's regime and the non-Iraqi fighters responsible for at least some of the attacks on US forces and their Iraqi allies, the official said. Funny thing with this story is they are talking of remenants of the former regime... Not talking about any connection prior to Saddam being removed. And the big one: The group operated in a small section of northern Iraq surrounded by Kurdish-controlled areas which were outside Saddam's control. Kurdish officials have long alleged that Saddam's government helped Ansar, but US officials have said they haven't yet found definitive proof of that. http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...le.asp?ID=5571 Bush administration and PUK officials have also speculated that Ansar may be working with Saddam through a man named Abu Wa'il, reportedly an al-Qaeda operative on Saddam's payroll. Speculation is a bad thing.... Facts, now those are good things. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...3/768rwsbj.asp This article removes the validation of any prior to it. One man that was suposed to be active with Ansar al Islam in Northern Iraq was actually killed in January 2000 in a battle with Lebanese forces.... Sorry but a dead man can't be active 1 year 9 months after his death... Ansar al Islam was started September 1, 2001 according to all other accounts. http://www.themercury.news.com.au/co...55E401,00.html That information is the first solid evidence of links between remnants of Saddam's regime and the non-Iraqi fighters responsible for at least some of the attacks on US forces and their Iraqi allies, the official said. Funny thing with this story is they are talking of remenants of the former regime... Not talking about any connection prior to Saddam being removed. And the big one: The group operated in a small section of northern Iraq surrounded by Kurdish-controlled areas which were outside Saddam's control. Kurdish officials have long alleged that Saddam's government helped Ansar, but US officials have said they haven't yet found definitive proof of that. By the way... It is the same article from the Fox News site http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/i...-attacks_x.htm I won't repeat it a 3rd time... This is the same story as the Fox News Site again Sorry but I don't get swayed by repetitive articles... My mind works better than that. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Some in Bush's 'coalition of the willing' are suddenly losingtheir will | General | |||
Gotta fit this boat in garage, 3" to spare in width. Doable as a practical matter? | General | |||
Bush and Human Rights | General | |||
Just How Safe Do You Feel? | General |