wrote in message
ink.net...
Interesting....
I copy the same paragraph you do and find it says "MEQUON, Wis., May 14 --
President Bush told graduates of a Christian college Friday that the abuse
of Iraqi prisoners has embarrassed the country, and he offered
"compassionate conservatism" as an antidote to "show the good heart of our
country to the whole world." "

Now further down in the story it does say:
"Bush spoke of Nicholas Berg, the young American who was recently beheaded
in Iraq. The CIA has blamed Abu Musab Zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist
connected to the al Qaeda terrorist network, and Bush used the killing to
make the case that Saddam Hussein "had terrorist ties."
"The person responsible for the Berg death, Zarqawi, was in and out of
Baghdad prior to our arrival, for example," the president said. "

But I don't see bush quoted here as blaming "al Qaeda supporter Abu Musab
Zarqawi for beheading American Nicholas Berg"

Huh? You don't see Bush quoted as blaming Zarqawi? Here's what *your*
article says:
"The person responsible for the Berg death, Zarqawi, was in and out of
Baghdad prior to our arrival, for example," the president said. "



I do see the CIA blaming him

Funny how you try to twist things your way, and find the twist isn't
there.


Twist things my way? All I did was post a story from Friday's Washington
Post. The title of the article was "Bush Says Berg's Death Links Hussein, Al
Qaeda". What more proof do you need that Bush will use the time between now
and November to show the link between al Qaeda and Hussein?