John Gaquin wrote:
Anyone who thinks there has not been connection and coordination between
Iraq and al Qaida is a naive fool.

Why? Because Rush Limbaugh and the Bush/Cheney campaign ads have worked
very very hard to convince you there is a connection?

Guess what... they fooled you. There isn't one. If Bush had proof, he'd
be using more of that big fat $200 million advertising budget to make
sure that every man, woman, and child on planet Earth knew all about it.
But he can't, because it doesn't exist.

So far, there are only 3 things that indicate a connection:

1- a meeting between an al-Queda member and an Iraqi intelligence
officer in Czechoslovakia, which most analysts now believe never happened.

2- Al-Zarqawi, likely murderer of Nick Berg, living & operating in
Iraq... but wait, it's been proven that he spent most of his time before
the invasion in the Kurdish zone... our friends, the Kurds, who hated
Saddam and were fighting against him

3- garish posters of the planes crashing into the Twin Towers hanging on
several walls, glorifying the terrorists.

That's it. That's all of it.

Now who is a "niave fool"... the eprson who looks at the facts and says,
"Gosh, not much there" or the person who blows a lot of gas based on
hype & hints (and let's not forget the outright lies)?

DSK