| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message nk.net... John You right winged jack ass, September 11, 2001 was done by al-Qaida... What does that have to do with an unjust war in Iraq? In February 2003, Colin Powell made the case before the UN that al Zaqawi was in control of an Iraqi al Qaeda group. The nexus with Al Qaeda, Mr. Powell said, originates with a branch headed by Abu Massab al-Zaqawi, a senior associate of Osama bin Laden. He said Mr. Zaqawi has a camp in the northeastern corner of Kurdish Iraq teaching terrorist operatives how to produce ricin and other extremely lethal chemicals. He said Mr. Zaqawi has received medical treatment in Baghdad and that there are also other Zaqawi brigades operating in Baghdad. "From his terrorist network in Iraq, Zaqawi can direct his terrorist network in the Middle East and beyond," Mr. Powell said. He also accused Mr. Zaqawi of providing money and weapons used in the murder of Lawrence Foley, an employee with the Agency for International Development, in Amman, Jordan last October. He noted that "Al Qaeda continues to have deep interest in acquiring weapons of mass destruction" and that Qaeda operatives trained with chemical weapons in Iraq between 1997 and 2000." Now, al Zaqawi is leading the terrorist attacks against coalition troops, civilians, and oil pipelines and rigs in the region. It doesn't take a genius to see the relation. Not a freaking thing. Must be nice living in denial. Everything's peachy-keen there, eh? Yes we lost almost 3000 that day... Go to war against those that caused that day to happen, not against the people of Iraq. The people who made 9/11 happen are the ones who are trying to kill our troops in Iraq. It is clear, by the name of the suposed man involved with Saturday's travesty that al-Qaida is the enemy. Well, no **** Sherlock. al-Qaida is the one trying to kill Americans al-Qaida is the one killing innocent Americans al-Qaida is the one we are at war with al Qaida has a heavy presence in Iraq...now...and before the war. America wouldn't negotiate with these criminals, America wouldn't do anything to help save this mans life, America thought him to be expendable. What would you have had America to do? Leave Iraq? As if that would have worked... You're talking out of both sides of your mouth. First you said he was killed because of what happened in Abu Ghraib. Then you said he was killed because America wouldn't help him. If he was killed because of Abu Ghraid, then there was nothing we could have done anyhow. Right? Not my America, only yours. My America would have taken the time needed to find where this man was, then mow down the full lot of them including the prisoners they wanted released. The tape lasted a little over 5 minutes. It would have been a helluva feat to locate the terrorists and kill 'em before the last 30 seconds of it. My America would have brought this man home safe. I'm not sure what America you live in, but I want nothing to do with any America that thinks any AMERICAN is expendable. Remember these people, as they deserve to be remembered... They have paid the ultimate price for you to sit on your right winged ass and say they aren't worth it. Nick Berg from Pennsylvania.... Remember that name as you praise the people that torture. His mother - Suzanne His Father - Michael His Sister - Sarah His Brother - David Remember these 5 names as you praise the work of the current administration, remember them as you open your eyes to see the failed policy, the needless deaths. It must end, America must withdraw, the killing must come to an end. I pity you The killing will only continue. However, it will be in NY, and LA, and Chicago, and Washington...instead of Baghdad, Fallujah, Basra, and Najaf. No thanks. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 12 May 2004 00:23:36 -0400, NOYB wrote:
In February 2003, Colin Powell made the case before the UN that al Zaqawi was in control of an Iraqi al Qaeda group. While al-Zarqawi is definitely anti-American, some analysts dispute that he is al Qaeda. Oh, and much of his terrorist training was under the watchful eye of our very own CIA in Afghanistan fighting the Soviets. You have to love the foresight exhibited by our trusty spooks. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3483089.stm The nexus with Al Qaeda, Mr. Powell said, originates with a branch headed by Abu Massab al-Zaqawi, a senior associate of Osama bin Laden. He said Mr. Zaqawi has a camp in the northeastern corner of Kurdish Iraq teaching terrorist operatives how to produce ricin and other extremely lethal chemicals. Just to remind you, Kurdish Iraq was in the US defined "no-fly zone", where al-Zarqawi was protected from Saddam, by *us*. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 12 May 2004 00:23:36 -0400, NOYB wrote: In February 2003, Colin Powell made the case before the UN that al Zaqawi was in control of an Iraqi al Qaeda group. While al-Zarqawi is definitely anti-American, some analysts dispute that he is al Qaeda. Which "analysts"? The ones quoted by al Jazeera? Oh, and much of his terrorist training was under the watchful eye of our very own CIA in Afghanistan fighting the Soviets. You have to love the foresight exhibited by our trusty spooks. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid...st/3483089.stm Your referenced website seems to refute your claim that al Zaqawi isn't linked to al Qaeda. Do you have any others that say he isn't al Qaeda? The nexus with Al Qaeda, Mr. Powell said, originates with a branch headed by Abu Massab al-Zaqawi, a senior associate of Osama bin Laden. He said Mr. Zaqawi has a camp in the northeastern corner of Kurdish Iraq teaching terrorist operatives how to produce ricin and other extremely lethal chemicals. Just to remind you, Kurdish Iraq was in the US defined "no-fly zone", where al-Zarqawi was protected from Saddam, by *us*. Iraq was violating the no-fly zones. Nevertheless, you don't need to fly airplanes over northeastern Iraq in order to maintain contact with the psycho operating up there. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:23:43 +0000, NOYB wrote:
While al-Zarqawi is definitely anti-American, some analysts dispute that he is al Qaeda. Your referenced website seems to refute your claim that al Zaqawi isn't linked to al Qaeda. Do you have any others that say he isn't al Qaeda? Uhh, I never claimed any such thing. I posted a link that said, amongst other things, "...Zarqawi's historical rivalry with Bin Laden." No doubt, Zarqawi's and bin Ladens anti-American aganda is similar and dangerous, but the jury is still out on whether he *is* al Qaeda. Iraq was violating the no-fly zones. Nevertheless, you don't need to fly airplanes over northeastern Iraq in order to maintain contact with the psycho operating up there. True, but Zarqawi's linkage to the CIA is a lot clearer that to Saddam. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:23:43 +0000, NOYB wrote: While al-Zarqawi is definitely anti-American, some analysts dispute that he is al Qaeda. Your referenced website seems to refute your claim that al Zaqawi isn't linked to al Qaeda. Do you have any others that say he isn't al Qaeda? Uhh, I never claimed any such thing. I posted a link that said, amongst other things, "...Zarqawi's historical rivalry with Bin Laden." No doubt, Zarqawi's and bin Ladens anti-American aganda is similar and dangerous, but the jury is still out on whether he *is* al Qaeda. Iraq was violating the no-fly zones. Nevertheless, you don't need to fly airplanes over northeastern Iraq in order to maintain contact with the psycho operating up there. True, but Zarqawi's linkage to the CIA is a lot clearer that to Saddam. Not in September '01. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| (OT) Some in Bush's 'coalition of the willing' are suddenly losingtheir will | General | |||
| Gotta fit this boat in garage, 3" to spare in width. Doable as a practical matter? | General | |||
| Bush and Human Rights | General | |||
| Just How Safe Do You Feel? | General | |||