![]() |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"John Smith" wrote in message news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53...
Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either. That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof of your wild allegations? From: John Smith ) Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News View this article only Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST Is that why you started smoking pot? Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated above, it's foolish of you! And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish": From: John Smith ) Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali View: Complete Thread (104 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he provided told him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to be able to read it. Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making such: From: John Smith ) Subject: OT Oh no! What next? View: Complete Thread (151 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST NOYB, You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self medicating with pot. Get the point, fool? |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
BK,
Here is your proof: http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en "basskisser" wrote in message om... "John Smith" wrote in message news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53... Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either. That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof of your wild allegations? From: John Smith ) Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News View this article only Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST Is that why you started smoking pot? Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated above, it's foolish of you! And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish": From: John Smith ) Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali View: Complete Thread (104 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he provided told him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to be able to read it. Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making such: From: John Smith ) Subject: OT Oh no! What next? View: Complete Thread (151 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST NOYB, You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self medicating with pot. Get the point, fool? |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Calif Bill" wrote
"Don" wrote "Calif Bill" wrote At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. As if that's a good thing. The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get out after their first term. If you had *served* you would already know this. Did you serve? Yes. I went in in 1965. Air Force. Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are little more than global thugs. |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Don" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. As if that's a good thing. The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get out after their first term. If you had *served* you would already know this. Based upon the new Democrat philosophy if you didn't serve in the military you have no right to quesiton those that did. I am not a Democrat and I will question whatever I choose. So, did you serve in the military? Four years, 75th Ranger Bn. |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Don" wrote in message
... "Calif Bill" wrote "Don" wrote "Calif Bill" wrote At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. As if that's a good thing. The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get out after their first term. If you had *served* you would already know this. Did you serve? Yes. I went in in 1965. Air Force. Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are little more than global thugs. I think that describes the administration perfectly, but not the majority of the soldiers. I will say, though, that anyone who believes success was likely has chosen not to learn from history. As we all know, that's always a mistake. Our tactics didn't work in the Phillippines or Vietnam. They will never work. |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.311f7f08d561cbb15e7a80c9c0f01fc4@108 2721942.nulluser.com... Doug Kanter wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message nk.net... It was a compliment to the aforementioned soldiers. Did you miss that? It was a knock on some reservists. Bush was a reservist. He could have been called up. But end of Vietnam came along, and the military was looking more at downsizing, than bringing up more people. 1) It wasn't intended as a knock on reservists. 2) Please don't mention Bush in the same discussion as real citizens. Things will go better that way. At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. Go to the blackboard and write 1000 times "Not everything revolves around Harry". :-) Au contraire, at least for most of the right-wing pondscum that pollutes this newsgroup! All I have to do is toss out one tiny piece of bait, and dozens of right-wing low-brain output types jump out of their trees to defend Bush, racism, corporate greed, xenophobia, drug companies, abortion clinic bombers, right-wing terrorists, the attorney general, Rush, faux news, and women who stay home and keep themselves barefoot and pregnant, ad nauseum. Why, without me, they wouldn't be able to exchange their lack-of-witticisms, bad grammar, bad spelling, and bad thoughts. Bill here has a problem because he tried to make it as a general contractor in California, but couldn't get the licenses he needed because he was unable to obtain workman's compensation insurance. He blames the requirement for that kind of insurance on the union movement. So, instead, he scrounged his living by taking on odd contracting jobs and visiting "shape-ups" early the morning where he could find unemployed men he could "hire" off the books and exploit because they were desperate for the few dollars he'd pay. Bill's anti-union because the union movement was a minor impediment in his desire to take advantage of the working class. Your still full of **** Harry. You could not make it in the real world, so you rode the backs of working men and women as a union organizer and hack to be able to buy expensive custom boats, while they have to go on strike, giving up income while you still collect your excessive lucre. And anybody here can get workers comp. Just pay the money. |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Don" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote "Don" wrote "Calif Bill" wrote At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. As if that's a good thing. The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get out after their first term. If you had *served* you would already know this. Did you serve? Yes. I went in in 1965. Air Force. Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are little more than global thugs. I bet you said the same thing about Viet Nam era soldiers. Did you serve in the military or Peace Corp? |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"John Smith" wrote in message news:oa8ic.10560$aQ6.865067@attbi_s51...
BK, Here is your proof: Of WHAT??? That you post wild allegations and assumptions, and present them as fact? Hell, everybody here KNOWS you do that..now everybody knows that you think that it is foolish to do so. http://www.google.com/groups?safe=im...sser&lr=&hl=en "basskisser" wrote in message om... "John Smith" wrote in message news:zrZhc.5803$_L6.668305@attbi_s53... Harry, There is no proof that you are not a serial murderer or a child molester, but it would be foolish for anyone to suggest you were either. That's odd, John Smith! YOU seem to think it's okay for YOU to post wild allegations and assumptions about others here, and present them as fact. Of course, then, when asked to show some form of evidence of such, you quickly try to change the course of action. Need some proof of your wild allegations? From: John Smith ) Subject: Good News, Good News, Good News View this article only Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-09 15:11:36 PST Is that why you started smoking pot? Have any evidence of me smoking pot? See? No proof, so, as YOU stated above, it's foolish of you! And this one, again proving that you are calling YOURSELF "foolish": From: John Smith ) Subject: Pentagon Hires Comical Ali View: Complete Thread (104 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-18 05:35:51 PST The best part about Basskisser's argument is the definition he provided told him why Schnapps is not a whiskey, but he must have been too stoned to be able to read it. Or this one. Once again, remember, you stated above that if there is no proof of someone's allegations, then they are foolish for making such: From: John Smith ) Subject: OT Oh no! What next? View: Complete Thread (151 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.boats Date: 2004-04-14 10:11:50 PST NOYB, You need to be nice to basskisser, he suffers from FAS, and is self medicating with pot. Get the point, fool? |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
"Don" wrote in message news:1nbic.2415 Serving in the military is no longer honorable because the soldiers are little more than global thugs. That's an asinine thing to say. |
( OT) Kerry Military Records
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:22:08 -0400, "Don" wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Don" wrote in message ... "Calif Bill" wrote At least Bush served. More than a lot of politco's and union head's sons did. As if that's a good thing. The militaries take advantage of youthful naivete and most of them get out after their first term. If you had *served* you would already know this. Based upon the new Democrat philosophy if you didn't serve in the military you have no right to quesiton those that did. I am not a Democrat and I will question whatever I choose. So, did you serve in the military? Four years, 75th Ranger Bn. Bull****. Rangers display more sense. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com