Time for some you to take some anger management classes Don. Are you ever
happy?

"Don" wrote in message
news
You're full of ****.
I am under no obligation file anything with anyone, and I will do exactly
as
I please and you have no say about it.
Our closest neighbor is over a mile away.
This boy has lost his capacity to think.


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:UZ7ic.10371$_L6.898892@attbi_s53...
Don, I am not reacting emotional, it appears that you are, based upon
your
experience with a bad neighbor. I hate to tell you this, but if someone
damages your property, you have neither the moral or the legal
justification
to damage your neighbors property. You have the right to file a report
with
the police and to take them to court.


"Don" wrote in message
...
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?
I said that if you choose to use MY stuff to YOUR benefit than I have
the
moral equivilent to do the same.
John, PLEASE think these things through before reacting emotionally.

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I
can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the
same
as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the
courts
on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd
consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long
as
the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You
really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the
"food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's
pets
for
a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your
beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of
knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open
yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

I design million dollar+ custom homes for wealthy island residents and live
in an area called *Simply Paradise* (run that past google for a clue) and am
always in a good mood and in good company.
I get a little frustrated at times when I go into usenet and encounter
legions of complete idiots like you.


"jim--" wrote in message
...
Time for some you to take some anger management classes Don. Are you ever
happy?

"Don" wrote in message
news
You're full of ****.
I am under no obligation file anything with anyone, and I will do
exactly
as
I please and you have no say about it.
Our closest neighbor is over a mile away.
This boy has lost his capacity to think.


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:UZ7ic.10371$_L6.898892@attbi_s53...
Don, I am not reacting emotional, it appears that you are, based upon
your
experience with a bad neighbor. I hate to tell you this, but if
someone
damages your property, you have neither the moral or the legal
justification
to damage your neighbors property. You have the right to file a
report
with
the police and to take them to court.


"Don" wrote in message
...
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?
I said that if you choose to use MY stuff to YOUR benefit than I
have
the
moral equivilent to do the same.
John, PLEASE think these things through before reacting emotionally.

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what
I
can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the
same
as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the
courts
on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd
consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as
long
as
the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws.
You
really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the
"food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's
pets
for
a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your
beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of
knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open
yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like it.



"Don" wrote in message
...
I design million dollar+ custom homes for wealthy island residents and
live
in an area called *Simply Paradise* (run that past google for a clue) and
am
always in a good mood and in good company.
I get a little frustrated at times when I go into usenet and encounter
legions of complete idiots like you.


"jim--" wrote in message
...
Time for some you to take some anger management classes Don. Are you
ever
happy?

"Don" wrote in message
news
You're full of ****.
I am under no obligation file anything with anyone, and I will do
exactly
as
I please and you have no say about it.
Our closest neighbor is over a mile away.
This boy has lost his capacity to think.


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:UZ7ic.10371$_L6.898892@attbi_s53...
Don, I am not reacting emotional, it appears that you are, based
upon
your
experience with a bad neighbor. I hate to tell you this, but if
someone
damages your property, you have neither the moral or the legal
justification
to damage your neighbors property. You have the right to file a
report
with
the police and to take them to court.


"Don" wrote in message
...
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?
I said that if you choose to use MY stuff to YOUR benefit than I
have
the
moral equivilent to do the same.
John, PLEASE think these things through before reacting
emotionally.

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from
what
I
can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the
same
as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in
the
courts
on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd
consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as
long
as
the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws.
You
really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under
the
"food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your
neighbor's
pets
for
a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all
your
beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair
of
knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU
open
yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly in
the face of logic.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:05:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly in
the face of logic.


What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous. Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response. I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:05:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to
me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like
it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly
in
the face of logic.


What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous. Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

The law does NOT say I can call a cop and have a destructive animal
liquidated. It says the animal can be liquidated. Period.


You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response. I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

Dave

So, you're a vegetarian?

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:38:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:



What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous. Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

The law does NOT say I can call a cop and have a destructive animal
liquidated. It says the animal can be liquidated. Period.

Show me that passage verbatim. Without your paraphrasing.



You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response. I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

Dave

So, you're a vegetarian?

Relevance?


Dave

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:05:17 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy? You sound pretty shallow to
me.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like
it.

He's pretty friendly to me, even though we disagree on a few things. But
see....here's the deal: Neither he nor I say outrageous things that fly
in
the face of logic.


What? Most of your arguments thus far on this topic have been
outrageous.

It appears that way to you because you are viewing it from a socialists
perspective.
You have nothing of value so you thusly place no value on anyone elses
stuff.

Both of you guys are projecting the position that you are
justified in taking the law into your own hands, despite written law
to the contrary.

Now you're outright lying.
I am not talking about *taking the law into my own hands*, only you are.
Again, that is because you seem to be a socialist so everything to you is
*collective* in nature.
Rather than solving your problems, you would prefer the state to solve them
for you, that is why you continuously use the *law* reference.

You bemoan "inconsiderate" neighbors, who may be guilty of some degree
of negligence, but "retaliate" against them with an equally
inconsiderate response.

You're outright lying again, why?
Doug has tried to work things out with the neighbor, he has mentioned this
several times, yet the neighbor continues to disregard Dougs property
rights.
He didn't fly off the handle and kill the neighbors dog upon the first
infraction as you stated above.
So again, why are you lying your ass off?
Is it because it's the only way you can make an argument?

I'm sorry but you will never convince me that
you are morally or legally authorized to terminate the life of another
living being no matter what "damage" or inconvenience they may have
caused you. There are proper channels to seek out compensation or
retribution for these acts. That these proper channels are not "good
enough" for you is not our problem.

It seems to be a problem for you though.

"jim--" wrote in message
...
So you think that money makes one happy?

Did I mention anything at all about my income?
No, you just made it up.
That is how immoral assholes act.

You sound pretty shallow to me.

Should I give a **** what a usenet moron that makes **** up thinks?
I don't.

And are you friendly to anyone on this board? It does not look like it.

I came here being friendly, seeking info on a boat, then I was attacked by
morons such as you.
Do you have an excuse for your idiotic behavior?




"Don" wrote in message
...
I design million dollar+ custom homes for wealthy island residents and
live
in an area called *Simply Paradise* (run that past google for a clue)
and
am
always in a good mood and in good company.
I get a little frustrated at times when I go into usenet and encounter
legions of complete idiots like you.


"jim--" wrote in message
...
Time for some you to take some anger management classes Don. Are you
ever
happy?

"Don" wrote in message
news You're full of ****.
I am under no obligation file anything with anyone, and I will do
exactly
as
I please and you have no say about it.
Our closest neighbor is over a mile away.
This boy has lost his capacity to think.


"John Smith" wrote in message
news:UZ7ic.10371$_L6.898892@attbi_s53...
Don, I am not reacting emotional, it appears that you are, based
upon
your
experience with a bad neighbor. I hate to tell you this, but if
someone
damages your property, you have neither the moral or the legal
justification
to damage your neighbors property. You have the right to file a
report
with
the police and to take them to court.


"Don" wrote in message
...
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?
I said that if you choose to use MY stuff to YOUR benefit than I
have
the
moral equivilent to do the same.
John, PLEASE think these things through before reacting
emotionally.

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from
what
I
can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is
the
same
as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in
the
courts
on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what
you'd
consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed
as
long
as
the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons
laws.
You
really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under
the
"food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your
neighbor's
pets
for
a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all
your
beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched
pair
of
knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU
open
yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:57:05 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

I design million dollar+ custom homes for wealthy island residents and live
in an area called *Simply Paradise* (run that past google for a clue) and am
always in a good mood and in good company.
I get a little frustrated at times when I go into usenet and encounter
legions of complete idiots like you.


"legions of idiots" who understand the law, and generally oppose folks
who don't seem to understand the concept that society works both ways
Even for wealthy elitists........

Dave