Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message news ![]() Jim, I agree this legislation seems quite scarry. There are some tricky lines here. On the one hand most people think there is already to much political sway held by groups with money. Hence there are laws that regulate how groups that are primarily political in nature - or are taking political stances - how they can raise and spend money. On the other hand it's importand that watchdog groups or any group that notices problems in the government can raise and spend the money they need to -- in the ways they need to -- to aleart the public. In this case I don't yet know enough about the current and proposed laws to know what makes sense. I will say that if "we" are going to error or if the lines are at all blurry then I think we should CERTAINLY have fewer laws and more ability for groups to speak out. The free flow of ideas and information is what keeps it all honest. Gary |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off Topic: Republicans VS Democrats | General | |||
Obit: rec.boats | General |