Why are you assuming that I'm upset?
Why are you personalizing my decision to share the factual information
about a fisheries management meeting with the NG?

Two facts: The meeting will take place when and where scheduled and the
agenda will be
as outlined. There is a potential for this to impact sport fishing.

As I expressed no personal opinion pro or con, it is silly of you to
say I'm "upset". Shadow somebody else for a change, why don't you?

wrote in message
oups.com...
Why are you assuming that I'm upset?
Why are you personalizing my decision to share the factual information
about a fisheries management meeting with the NG?

Two facts: The meeting will take place when and where scheduled and the
agenda will be
as outlined. There is a potential for this to impact sport fishing.

As I expressed no personal opinion pro or con, it is silly of you to
say I'm "upset". Shadow somebody else for a change, why don't you?


I am not shadowing you Chuck. You posted a topic about an "ominous day" and
I asked a question of you. When you use the term "ominous" you subtly
insert your feelings on the topic.

Chill out.

om·i·nous (adj.
1.. Menacing; threatening: ominous black clouds; ominous rumblings of
discontent.
2.. Of or being an omen, especially an evil one.
Your subject made it sound like you were upset.


wrote in message
oups.com...
Why are you assuming that I'm upset?
Why are you personalizing my decision to share the factual information
about a fisheries management meeting with the NG?

Two facts: The meeting will take place when and where scheduled and the
agenda will be
as outlined. There is a potential for this to impact sport fishing.

As I expressed no personal opinion pro or con, it is silly of you to
say I'm "upset". Shadow somebody else for a change, why don't you?

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 02:16:31 -0400, "Real McCoy" email wrote:

om·i·nous (adj.
1.. Menacing; threatening: ominous black clouds; ominous rumblings of
discontent.
2.. Of or being an omen, especially an evil one.
Your subject made it sound like you were upset.

It's quite possible the Pacific Fishery Management Council meeting was
ominous for fishing folks in the area but Gould couldn't care less.

Jim H and Co sure try hard to find something about Gould to bitch
about. Do you guys have a bit of penis envy?

bb

bb wrote:


Jim H and Co sure try hard to find something about Gould to bitch
about. Do you guys have a bit of penis envy?

bb


Hee hee...if you were 'boatless' on a crappy polluted shallow lake, and
you were at odds with another poster who boats on probably the 2nd best
ocean cruising grounds on the continent...(after my home waters) ..would
that make you envious? HELL YES!