Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ominous day for West Coast Fishing

While the following press release is primarily addressing commercial
fishing, the phrase "large areas cold be declared off limits to
trawling and other activities" may have some repercussions for sports
fishermen:

Media Advisory

Contact: Kathleen Goldstein, Environmental Defense, 202-841-0295

Pacific Fishery Management Council to Address Critical Fishery
Management Issues

What: The Pacific Fishery Management Council will meet to make crucial
decisions on the future of several West Coast fisheries - salmon,
groundfish, coastal pelagic species and highly migratory species.
Large zones could be declared off-limits to trawling and other
activities, and management reform that could result in huge economic
and conservation benefits is on the line.

When: June 12 - 17, 2005

Whe Crowne Plaza Mid Peninsula, 1221 Chess Drive, Foster City,
California 94404, Phone: 800-227-6963

Major Management Decision:
Groundfish Management

The Council will vote on whether to proceed with the analysis of design
options for an Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) program for the Pacific
groundfish trawl fishery, culminating a two-year design process. On
June 16, the Council will review the recommendations from a stakeholder
advisory committee and, after receiving input from its advisory bodies
and the public, determine whether to proceed by approving a range of
IFQ alternatives for further technical analysis.

This analysis is critical for the Council's development of a
preferred alternative that best meets its conservation, economic social
and management objectives for the fishery. Funding this analysis is
essential to move forward and build on the valuable work that has
already been accomplished.

Environmental Defense calls for the Council to vote to continue the
analysis for the groundfish IFQ program, because it will bring economic
stability and ecological restoration to the fishery. The design
alternatives that are before the Council include many that
Environmental Defense has long advocated:

100 percent observer coverage on board fishing vessels and at dockside;

Accumulation limits so that no entity can acquire an excessive share of
the quota;

Bycatch caps for each kind of gear and transferable individual bycatch
quotas (to reward clean fishing techniques);

A range of initial allocation provisions that recognize the
contribution to and dependence upon the fishery by harvesters,
processors and coastal communities; and

Freely transferable, divisible shares to facilitate investment in the
fishery by crew and other new entrants.

These components will provide economic and community benefits while
facilitating the recovery of the groundfish species and seafloor
habitats, resulting in greater economic, social and regulatory
stability.

For more information and the meeting agenda, please go to
http://www.pcouncil.org/events/2005/pfmc0605.html.

The following spokespeople are available for comment:
Johanna Thomas, Deputy Program Director, Oceans, Environmental Defense
Rod Fujita, Marine Ecologist, Environmental Defense

###

Environmental Defense, a leading national nonprofit organization,
represents more than 400,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense
has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector
partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious
environmental problems.

www.environmentadefense.org
www.oceansalive.org

  #2   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Overfishing has been reported as a problem globally for years. Why are you
upset now about a plan that addresses the problem in your back yard?


  #3   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why are you assuming that I'm upset?
Why are you personalizing my decision to share the factual information
about a fisheries management meeting with the NG?

Two facts: The meeting will take place when and where scheduled and the
agenda will be
as outlined. There is a potential for this to impact sport fishing.

As I expressed no personal opinion pro or con, it is silly of you to
say I'm "upset". Shadow somebody else for a change, why don't you?

  #4   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
Why are you assuming that I'm upset?
Why are you personalizing my decision to share the factual information
about a fisheries management meeting with the NG?

Two facts: The meeting will take place when and where scheduled and the
agenda will be
as outlined. There is a potential for this to impact sport fishing.

As I expressed no personal opinion pro or con, it is silly of you to
say I'm "upset". Shadow somebody else for a change, why don't you?


I am not shadowing you Chuck. You posted a topic about an "ominous day" and
I asked a question of you. When you use the term "ominous" you subtly
insert your feelings on the topic.

Chill out.


  #8   Report Post  
UglyDan®©™
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hehe, "Stakeholder advisory committee", and who pray tell might they
be??
Care to take a wild guess.

If it smells like a fish, Make it a dish!
"If it smells like cologne, Leave it alone!

UD



http://community.webtv.net/capuglyda...inUglyDansJack

  #10   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On 3 Jun 2005 13:18:23 -0700, wrote:

While the following press release is primarily addressing commercial
fishing, the phrase "large areas cold be declared off limits to
trawling and other activities" may have some repercussions for sports
fishermen:

Media Advisory

Contact: Kathleen Goldstein, Environmental Defense, 202-841-0295

Pacific Fishery Management Council to Address Critical Fishery
Management Issues


~~ snippage ~~

Is the Pacific Fishery Management Council the agency charged with
regulating, controlling and establishing fisheries quotas or is this
council an invention of the Environmental Defense Fund?

Later,

Tom


I have been out fishing on Lake Erie with a mass of walleye showing on the
fish finder and close to some nets set up by commercial fishermen. We
caught our limit and returned to the same spot the next day....no fish. We
moved. No fish. We moved again...several times....no fish. Go figure.

Try to take a boat ride from Huron to Cedar Point or Sandusky Bay without
running into commercial nets in the water....they are everywhere.

We need to limit the number of pounds of fish commercial fishermen harvest.
If I recall Canada has not set up any such restrictions on commercial
fishing in the Great Lakes and they are raping our Lake of fish. Without
these restrictions we can kiss any sort of recreational fishing goodbye.

So I welcome any studies and restrictions on fishing limits, most especially
those aimed at commercial fishing operations.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fishing The Carolina Coast Capt. Dave General 0 January 7th 05 01:48 AM
Fishing the Florida Coast Don ßåiley General 19 November 11th 04 02:53 AM
Fishing The Carolina Coast Capt. Dave General 3 November 10th 04 08:48 PM
Fishing Boat Missing in Gulf near Pensacola Harry Krause General 0 February 29th 04 10:58 AM
Fishing The Carolina Coast Capt. Dave General 4 December 31st 03 06:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017